Who Says India Is Friendless?

8 Minutes Read Listen to Article
Share:

June 07, 2025 11:33 IST

x

The reality is that far from being friendless, India is better positioned in the world than at any point post-Cold War, asserts Shekhar Gupta.

IMAGE: The all-party delegation led by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor meets US Vice President J D Vance, in Washington, DC, June 5, 2025. Photograph: Shashi Tharoor/X
 

No, it isn't the N-word for nuclear weapons. National Interest shies from such simplicity or predictability and searches for complexity.

That's why our N-word this week is 'narrative', an expression so cliched that I have banned it in successive newsrooms, unless, of course, narrative is what we are talking about.

The murmurs started immediately after the Pahalgam outrage. Why is the world not upbraiding Pakistan? That complaint became a clamour with Operation Sindoor.

Why is nobody saying 'well done'? The Western media were the usual suspects.

Why aren't they acknowledging our armed forces' successes? How dare they equivocate or suggest we've suffered attrition?

Then, Donald Trump joined in the melee and the clamour became a convulsion. Inevitable conclusion: Nobody is with us. India must fight for its cause alone?

Victimhood is compellingly seductive and we have cultivated it into a chronic disease across generations.

There are, however, factual problems with this.

First, we've never been alone, except in 1965. In 1971, the Soviets were our treaty-bound allies.

During Kargil, Operation Parakram, and 26/11 almost all of the rest of the world leaned towards us. Even the Chinese were nuanced.

After Pokhran-II in 1998, the Americans took no time lifting the sanctions, accepting India as a strategically important friendly, nuclear-armed power, and have never said anything adverse over Kashmir again.

In 2000, on his brief airport stopover in Pakistan on his way home from India, Bill Clinton spoke on camera and, wagging his finger, told the Pakistanis that lines on the map of the region could no longer be drawn in blood.

Pakistan lost its American anchor, and became a Chinese protectorate.

Following Pulwama-Balakot, the Americans played a constructive role in de-escalation in a manner that suited India.

IMAGE: The all-party delegation led by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor with Pennsylvania Senator Dave McCormick, Nevada Senator Jacky Rosen and Texas Senator John Cornyn at the United States Capitol in Washington, DC, June 4, 2025. Photograph: 1ANI Photo

The difference between then and now is that Trump as the 47th president is a far cry from Trump as the 45th.

This Trump is a schoolkid who wants credit for everything.

I really adore the wit on Twitter who remarked when Virat Kohli announced his retirement: How come Donald Trump did not announce it to the world first?

One look at his track record tells you he takes special delight in trolling -- even publicly humiliating his friends and allies -- and pretends to flatter their common adversaries.

Think Vladimir Putin, Syria's Ahmed Al Sharaa, Iran, and, in the instance of our ongoing neurosis, unnamed Pakistanis: They are great people, make wonderful products, I know their leader very well. I am not sure if he does. He might think it is 'that cricketer, very charming, great guy'.

To be fair though, most people will be confused: Is it the prime minister or the field marshal?

He insulted Canada's Mark Carney, Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and, most recently, South Africa's Cyril Ramaphosa with WhatsApp University-quality folklore on the 'genocide of whites'.

The world is still learning to distinguish between Trump that is theatre and his administration's reality.

Anytime you are triggered over Mr Trump's boasts, read the tweets of Marco Rubio, J D Vance, Tulsi Gabbard, Kash Patel, and others.

Even the readout of Mr Rubio's calls to India and Pakistan is nuanced.

There's advice to the Pakistanis to cooperate with India and to act against terrorists operating from their soil. What else does India want? A licence to shoot?

Self-pitying victimhood is worse than defeatism in that it also makes you frustrated.

The stupidest thing you've been hearing lately is that the West (read Washington) has rehyphenated India with Pakistan.

Hello, has anybody told you to enter into negotiations over Kashmir and offered to mediate?

Even Mr Trump's boasts are about mediating a ceasefire.

It's been nearly six years since India changed the Constitutional status of Jammu & Kashmir.

No friendly power has objected, or asked you to reverse it.

Turkey is marginal for us and Azerbaijan not even that.

As for the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, no Muslim nation has much time for that near-defunct body.

Even in the latest round, important Islamic countries -- Indonesia, Bahrain, and Egypt -- ensured criticism of India was greatly moderated.

The reality, therefore, is that far from being friendless, India is better positioned in the world than at any point post-Cold War.

It is a supreme irony and a stunning example of that incurable Indian 'ekla chalo re' (I shall walk alone) fixation when India enjoys enormous goodwill and company of friends.

Equally, it is also an incredible retreat from the heady G20 era, when India was hailed as the rising star in the world, and Narendra Modi the leader everybody deferred to.

Our understanding of what has changed then depends on what our expectations were. We've avoided the term 'ally' with the Americans.

We've insisted Quad isn't described as a security alliance (though Mr Trump did in Mr Modi's presence), we routinely upbraid the Europeans post-Ukraine.

We set great store by strategic autonomy, which has served India well.

What did we want our friends to do this time? To join us in clobbering Pakistan? While we did so?

It is, in fact, the Americans, many who've used the expression 'ally' for India in their tweets and statements.

We've already expended a thousand words explaining how rather than being lonely or friendless we are living in a world filled with friends.

We've worked very hard over decades to earn this stature. Then where is our pain coming from?

IMAGE: The all-party parliamentary delegation led by Bharatiya Janata Party MP Ravi Shankar Prasad interacts with members of the European Parliament from the Delegation for Relations with India, Foreign Affairs Committee, and Security and Defence, in Brussels, June 4, 2025. Photograph: ANI Photo

Back to that N-word. We are an odd people, in fact more the establishment, who hold the Western media, non-government organisations, think-tanks, intellectuals, and academia in contempt.

They are all prejudiced against us. They can't tolerate the rise of India. They don't matter. We must carry on regardless.

If so, why do we hyperventilate at their criticism and questions?

It's inexplicable and if it wasn't upsetting our public opinion so much, I'd even call it amusing.

We can't be so contemptuous of Western opinion and yet so angry they don't understand us.

Over the years, our establishment has stopped engaging with the Western media, especially those based in India.

Most of them have experienced visa struggles and have been admonished for being 'anti-Indian'.

Then we complain they've vitiated global opinion against us and send members of Parliament on taxpayer-funded vacation to undo the damage.

We have to first decide if global opinion matters to us or not. If it does, we must drop all ego and bluster and engage with their media, think-tanks, and civil society.

If we don't, stop this tamasha of MPs going from port to port.

Global opinion isn't shaped just by summit meetings or events like Operation Sindoor. It is a combination of complex factors, including a nation's soft power.

When Pakistan's director general, Inter-Services Public Relations, said even the Indian media was raising questions about its government's claims, Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri gave a good reply by reminding him this was how a democracy works, and how would a Pakistani know that.

Does it square with him being targeted for his daughter's views or the arrest of the Ashoka University professor for a Facebook post so innocuous that even the honourable Supreme Court needs the help of three senior IPS (Indian Police Service) officers to read between the lines for anything offensive?

IMAGE: The all-party delegation led by Nationalist Congress Party – Sharadchandra Pawar MP Supriya Sule call on Ahmed Aboul Gheit, secretary-general, League of Arab States in Cairo, June 3, 2025. Photograph: ANI Photo

The Ali Khan Mehmudabad (Ashoka University professor) story made it to the New York Times, as did an even bigger one on our commando comic channels waging a private war where the navy took Karachi, the army captured Islamabad, and the IAF obliterated everything in between.

It became so embarrassing that finally even the government had to direct them to stop using the air raid sirens as part of the background score along with the usual drum roll.

All of these have damaged India and turned, very regrettably, India's soft power into a hard liability.

To reset and repair this N-Word, we must begin here and now. Meanwhile, we wish our MPs a productive, joyful boondoggle.

By special arrangement with The Print

Feature Presentation: Aslam Hunani/Rediff

Get Rediff News in your Inbox:
Share: