Advertisement

Help
You are here: Rediff Home » India » News » Message Board
Search:  Rediff.com The Web
Advertisement
  Discuss this Article   |      Email this Article   |      Print this Article

Should India have helped liberate Bangladesh?
Related Articles
No terrorist camps in Bangladesh: Dhaka

Why India is concerned about Bangladesh

'We are worried about violence in Bangladesh'

Firing intensifies on India-Bangladesh border

Bangladesh: Next terror frontier?

Get news updates:What's this?
Advertisement
December 05, 2006
Thirty-five years after India helped liberate Bangladesh, relations between the two nations are strained. Relations between Dhaka and Islamabad, on the other hand, continue to improve, particularly after Pakistan's President General Pervez Musharraf [Images] made an indirect apology for the atrocities of 1971.

Many politicians now in power in Dhaka had opposed independence, and some even plaintively note that had they not declared independence, they would have been a nuclear weapons State now.

Many Indian observers have slammed then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi [Images] for not having negotiated a settlement on Kashmir in return for the 93,000 Pakistani POWs captured after the war.

Indian concerns now include illegal migration, support for rebels in the northeast, increasing Bangladeshi links with Pakistan's ISI and terrorist acts in India, regular border skirmishes, and the general anti-India mood in Bangladesh.

In retrospect, was India right in helping create Bangladesh? Tell us

The 1971 War: 35 Years On



 Email this Article      Print this Article

© 2008 Rediff.com India Limited. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer | Feedback