The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is likely to pull up the Directorate General of Hydrocarbons, as well as Reliance Industries, over an alleged hoarding of gas by the Mukesh Ambani-controlled company.
According to an official close to the development, in the coming financial audit report, to be tabled in Parliament’s Budget session next year, CAG will detail the slide in the government’s share in petroleum sector profits due to a drop in gas production.
Besides, the statutory auditor is also looking into the pricing of gas produced from RIL’s D1 and D3 fields.
“The report will clearly mention that the regulator failed in examining whether an intentional hoarding of gas by RIL caused a loss to the exchequer.
“Though there were some steps taken by DGH, those were not enough to ascertain if there was hoarding,” said a senior CAG official.
The development has come even as DGH is asking RIL, the private operator, to relinquish a large part of the KG-D6 block, besides eight discoveries worth over $10 billion.
So far, DGH has proposed a penalty of $1.8 billion for shortfall in production from KG-D6.
According to the official, the report might also look at whether or not the price of D1 and D3 gas should be raised to $8.4 a million British thermal unit till the company meets its earlier gas supply commitments.
In August, the auditor had sought the ministry’s views on the steps taken to ensure RIL supplied gas at the old rate of $4.2 an mBtu, in line with the production plan.
The total shortfall in production during four years to 2013-14 was 154 million standard cubic metre a day.
Compared with targets approved earlier, the production shortfall was 5 mscmd in 2010-11, 28 mscmd in 2011-12, 55 mscmd in 2012-13 and 66 mscmd in 2013-14.
According to 2006 development plan, D1 and D3 fields were to produce 61.88 mscmd from 22 wells in 2011-12 and 80 mscmd from 31
RIL has said gas output has lagged projections also because of ‘substantial variance in reservoir behaviour and character being observed vis-a-vis the prediction and there seemed to be reservoir constraints in achieving the gas production rates’.
Besides, according to the company, pressure decline was several times higher than originally envisaged and early water production in some of the wells was not predicted in the initial reservoir simulations, though overall field water production was small.
Following a request from the oil ministry, CAG has been auditing KG-D6 spending from 2008-09 to 2011-12.
The auditor’s report is likely to highlight the loss the exchequer has had to bear due to the production falling to 3 trillion cubic feet, against the 10 tcf expected earlier.
“According to the initial estimates, the reserves were about 3 tcf.
“It was then revised to close to 10 tcf, and again back to about 3 tcf. This has caused huge loss to the country’s exchequer,” an official added.
The controversy around suppressed production had erupted in July, when A M Bajaj, principal director of audit (economic & service ministries) had written a letter and sought the intervention of Petroleum Secretary Vivek Rae, saying the auditor was facing difficulties, as RIL was not furnishing the required financial statements.
The audit team had issued 96 audit requisitions, including those for various records from 2008-09 to 2011-12. Later, the issue was sorted out between the two sides.
According to RIL, CAG cannot perform a performance audit, as the production-sharing contract allows it to look only into financial aspects.
The company had also said that the fall in production was due to natural constraints and technical issues, which were part of the oil and gas exploration business.