The Delhi High Court has rejected Christian Michel's plea for release in the AgustaWestland VVIP chopper scam, upholding his continued detention and raising questions about the India-UAE extradition treaty.
Key Points
- Delhi High Court dismisses Christian Michel's petition for release in the AgustaWestland VVIP chopper scam.
- Michel challenged the India-UAE extradition treaty, arguing he should only be prosecuted for offences for which he was extradited.
- Michel claimed he had already served the maximum sentence for the offences he was extradited for, rendering his detention illegal.
- Despite being granted bail by the Supreme Court in the CBI case and the High Court in the ED case, Michel remains in jail due to his inability to fulfil the bail conditions.
- The CBI alleges a significant loss to the exchequer due to the AgustaWestland deal, while the ED claims Michel received substantial funds from AgustaWestland.
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday dismissed a petition by alleged middleman Christian Michel James in the Rs 3,600-crore AgustaWestland VVIP chopper scam case seeking his release from jail.
A bench of Justices Navin Chawla and Ravinder Dudeja said there was no merit in the petition by the British national, who was extradited from Dubai in December 2018.
A detailed copy of the verdict is awaited.
Legal Challenges and Arguments
In his petition, James assailed a provision of the India-UAE extradition treaty. He also challenged a trial court order of August 7, 2025 by which his application under Section 436A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) for his release from jail was rejected.
James challenged Article 17 of the treaty, signed in 1999, which allows the requesting state (in this case India) to prosecute extradited persons not only for the specific offence for which extradition was done, but also for connected offences.
It was contended that an extradited person can be prosecuted only for the offences for which extradition took place, and not for connected offences.
After his extradition, James was arrested by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Enforcement Directorate (ED).
James also submitted that he completed seven years in jail on December 4, 2025 and has, therefore, already undergone the maximum sentence possible for the offences for which he was extradited, rendering his continued detention in India illegal.
Background of the Case
James is among the three alleged middlemen being probed in the case, and the other two are Guido Haschke and Carlo Gerosa.
He was granted bail by the Supreme Court in the CBI case in February 2025. The high court granted him bail in the ED case in March that year.
James, however, continues to be in jail as he was unable to fulfil the bail conditions.
A trial court directed James to furnish a personal bond of Rs 5 lakh and a cash surety of the same amount to secure his release in the CBI case. In the ED case, the high court asked him to furnish a personal bond of Rs 5 lakh and a cash surety of Rs 10 lakh.
The high court also clarified that James could be released without depositing the passport, which has expired "immediately". The authorities concerned were asked to deposit the fresh passport, whenever ready, with the trial court directly, it added.
The high court also asked the Foreigners Regional Registration Office (FRRO) to ensure that James does not leave the country.
Allegations and Financial Implications
The CBI, in its charge sheet, has alleged an estimated loss of 398.21 million euros (about Rs 2,666 crore) to the exchequer due to the deal that was signed on February 8, 2010, for the supply of VVIP choppers worth 556.26 million euros.
The ED, in its charge sheet filed against James in June 2016, alleged that he had received 30 million euros (about Rs 225 crore) from AgustaWestland.
© 2026