News APP

NewsApp (Free)

Read news as it happens
Download NewsApp

Available on  gplay

This article was first published 7 years ago
Rediff.com  » Business » All eyes on Q2 board meets at Tata companies

All eyes on Q2 board meets at Tata companies

By N Sundaresha Subramaniam
Last updated on: November 01, 2016 13:09 IST
Get Rediff News in your Inbox:

Cyrus Mistry with Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Cyrus Mistry, who was replaced as chairman of Tata Sons last Monday, October 24, still serves as the chairman of Tata Steel, Tata Motors, Tata Consultancy Services, Indian Hotels, Tata Global Beverages, Tata Chemicals, Tata Industries and Tata Teleservices.
N Sundaresha Subramanian reports.

The multiple stakeholders in the Tata group, including foreign investors, and regulators such as Securities and Exchange Board of India and the ministry of corporate affairs, are keeping a close watch on the coming board meetings of the group companies to approve their respective quarterly results.

Cyrus Mistry, who was replaced as chairman of Tata Sons last Monday, October 24, still serves as the chairman of Tata Steel, Tata Motors, Tata Consultancy Services, Indian Hotels, Tata Global Beverages, Tata Chemicals, Tata Industries and Tata Teleservices. TCS declared numbers earlier this month.

According to data compiled by the BS Research Bureau, 13 Tata companies are yet to declare their results for the quarter ended September 30.

This list includes biggies such as Tata Steel, Tata Motors, Tata Power and Indian Hotels.

According to regulations, the companies are required to declare their quarterly numbers within 45 days.

Most of these companies would call their board meetings over the next couple of weeks to meet the November 15 deadline.

The way these boards deal with Mistry would determine the further course of events in the Tata versus Mistry saga.

Legal experts feel the transition may not be smooth, given the stand taken by Mistry and the tone of his letter addressed to the Tata Sons board and trustees of Tata Trusts last week.

S N Ananthasubramanian, a senior company secretary, said, "The transition may not be smooth, but it is likely to be quick."

According to him, though the procedure for removal would be broadly the same as what happened in Tata Sons, the articles of association of individual companies would also come into play.

In Tata Sons, Mistry was redesignated as a non-executive director after the board passed the necessary resolutions to replace him and appoint Ratan Tata as interim chairman.

Further, Mistry himself would be more careful and apprehensive while approaching these board meetings and their agenda papers.

Two days after the big change at the Tata Sons, Mistry came to Bombay House to chair a routine board meet of Tata Global Beverages, giving a signal that he may not resign on his own.

On Friday, October 28, the board of Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) met to approve and declare its results.

However, there was no news of any change in board composition.

Another factor that would come into play is the mode of appointment.

If the shareholders had appointed the chairman, only then would they have the right to remove him.

On the other hand, if the shareholders appointed him as director and later the board elected him to chair, the removal could be done by the board itself, said experts.

This is where the role of independent directors and nominee directors, who represent institutions, could come into play.

Among the independent directors of companies chaired by Mistry are prominent personalities such as Deepak Parekh, Nusli Wadia, Mallika Srinivasan, O P Bhatt, Narendra Jadhav, Ireena Vittal and Subodh Bhargava.

Some like Wadia and Bhargava serve on multiple Tata boards.

Ananthasubramanian feels the alignment of purpose displayed by the directors of Tata Sons would be difficult to achieve in these different companies.

"Especially, in those companies where Mistry has made allegations, people would be careful. If not managed well, things could turn messy."

A small misstep could trigger a protracted legal battle.

While some like Parekh have publicly expressed their displeasure, other independent directors have criticised the move in private.

Parekh, who is an independent director on Indian Hotels board, said earlier this week that 'Cyrus was removed despite doing a reasonably good job,' adding that 'Mistry's ouster doesn't go well for Indian business and India's reputation.'

Therefore, an early announcement of successor, probably even before some of these crucial board meets, could be on the cards to allay concerns, some insiders feel, citing quick elevation of Tata Consultancy Services chief N Chandrasekaran and JLR's Ralf Spelth to the Tata Sons' board.

Ratan Tata himself has reached out to LIC and his lieutenants are busy engaging with other local and foreign institutions to restore confidence in the market.

It is not clear if all this would fuel more boardroom drama in coming days.

Prithvi Haldea, founder of Prime Database and recently appointed public interest director of MCX, said it was unlikely that even in these listed companies there are directors purely from Mistry's camp.

"All these directors are appointed by the promoters. It is unlikely that anyone would go against them," Haldea said.

IMAGE: Cyrus Mistry with Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Get Rediff News in your Inbox:
N Sundaresha Subramaniam
Source: source
 

Moneywiz Live!