HOME   
   NEWS   
   BUSINESS   
   CRICKET   
   SPORTS   
   MOVIES   
   NET GUIDE   
   SHOPPING   
   BLOGS  
   ASTROLOGY  
   MATCHMAKER  


Search:



The Web

Rediff








World Cup 2003
News
Schedule
Match Reports
Scorecards
Graphical Analysis
Squads
Venues
WC Format
Columns
Interviews
Specials
Gallery
Audio
Fantasy Cricket
Discussion Groups



Home > Cricket > World Cup 2003 > News > Report

Players reject 2 clauses in ICC contract

M Chhaya in Kolkata | January 11, 2003 20:00 IST

The Indian cricketers have rejected the two most contentious clauses while signing the player terms, Board of Control for Cricket in India president Jagmohan Dalmiya confirmed in Kolkata on Saturday.

"We had forwarded the player terms to our cricketers in New Zealand with the advice to sign along with their objections and forward these to the BCCI," Dalmiya told reporters. "The players have acted accordingly and we will send the contracts to the ICC within the stipulated deadline of January 14."

The Indian cricketers signed the contracts with the qualifications that 1) they would not indulge in conflicting sponsorship only during the 47-day period of the World Cup, and not before or after the event, and 2) they would allow imaging rights for two months only to those ICC sponsors who are not in conflict with their personal sponsors.

"The rest of the 22 clauses of the player terms have already been agreed upon," Dalmiya said, but added that he feared the altered contract might not be acceptable to the International Cricket Council.

"I'm not sure if the qualified signature to the Player Terms would be acceptable to the ICC," he said. "But we are keen to participate in the World Cup with the best team and there is no clause to prevent a team from participating if it has signed the Player Terms conditionally."

Dalmiya insisted that there is no way India could be scratched from the tournament. "If England don't play in Zimbabwe, will they be scratched from the tournament?" he said. "Cricket will go on. Commercial interests will not be allowed to affect cricket."

Dalmiya said the dispute could be resolved only through arbitration and "the ICC and BCCI's solicitors are already exchanging communication. Time has come to test the legality of the restrictive clauses as no player can be forced to break his pre-existing contracts."

He said the BCCI has suggested to the ICC that the step of non-binding mediation be skipped as per clause 31.4(D) of the Participating Nations Agreement to expedite the arbitration proceedings.

Asked if he thought the issue would be sorted out before the World Cup begins on February 8, he said: "We are keen to, and there is nothing in the PNA to stop India's participation for commercial disputes."

The Contracts Row: Complete coverage

Share your comments



Article Tools

Email this Article

Printer-Friendly Format

Letter to the Editor



Related Stories


Dalmiya reserves comment on signing

Dalmiya ridicules ICC sponsors

'It's all about personal interest'



People Who Read This Also Read


Dalmiya ridicules ICC sponsors

BCCI to share revenue with players

Ball in BCCI's Court: Hero Honda







HOME   
   NEWS   
   BUSINESS   
   CRICKET   
   SPORTS   
   MOVIES   
   NET GUIDE   
   SHOPPING   
   BLOGS  
   ASTROLOGY  
   MATCHMAKER  
Copyright © 2003 rediff.com India Limited. All Rights Reserved.