The classified US documents released by WikiLeaks could harm vital US national security interests in Pakistan and Yemen, though it does not appear to generate a national security crisis, a top American think-tank said.
Richard N Hass, president of the Council on Foreign Relations, a Washington-based think tank said the unauthorised release of a trove of diplomatic documents reveal little new information. "The latest unauthorised release, ie, leak, of some 250,000 documents by WikiLeaks does not appear to constitute a national security crisis, although it will cause more than a little near-term awkwardness and create some longer-term problems for the United States and its partners," said Hass.
He said much of what has been seen thus far confirms more than it informs. "We are not surprised to read US diplomatic cables reporting that corruption in Afghanistan is rampant; that prominent Sunni Arab leaders are more worried about Iran and its nuclear programme than they are about Israel; that it has been difficult to get other governments to accept Guantanamo detainees; that Syria's government maintains close ties to Hezbollah despite assurances to the contrary; or that Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi is a man of questionable character," he said.
In
"Counter terrorism efforts in Yemen might also be set back as the leadership there might well feel the need to distance itself from the United States," Hass noted. However, he said, the US can be assured in some cases like it is good to know that the United States and South Korea are holding serious discussions about how to reduce Chinese unease about the dissolution of North Korea and the unification of the peninsula.
"This is the only way to end a situation that, as recent events demonstrate, threaten not just regional but world peace... The longer term damage may be more real," Hass argued. "Foreign governments may think twice before sharing their secrets or even their candid judgements with American counterparts lest they read about them on the Internet. And American diplomats may be less less willing to commit their thoughts to paper. "Such reticence will deprive policymakers of an important source of information and make decision making more ad hoc and less systematic than it needs to be," Hass said.
