A Delhi court on Monday deferred till March 4 pronouncement of its judgment on the Central Bureau of Investigation's plea to drop the case against Italian businessman Ottavio Quattrocchi in Bofors payoff case.
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Vinod Yadav was scheduled to pronounce his order on Monday.
Seventy-year-old Quattrocchi has never appeared before any court in India to face trial.
The CBI had, in October 2009, sought permission of the court to withdraw the case against Quattrocchi, saying that his continued prosecution was "unjustified" in the light of various factors including the agency's failed attempts to extradite him.
The CBI had failed twice in extraditing him -- first from Malaysia in 2003 and then from Argentina in 2007. A charge sheet was filed against Quattrocchi for allegedly receiving a payoff for brokering the Bofors gun deal.
The CBI had registered a criminal case on January 20, 1990 to probe who were the beneficiaries of the payoffs in the 1986 Bofors gun deal.
After completing its probe, the agency had filed two charge sheets in the case -- first on October 22, 1999 and the other on October 9, 2000.
The CBI had contended that there was no change in the government's stand on withdrawing the case against Quattrocchi in the wake of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) order, which had said that kickbacks of Rs 61 crore were paid to late Win Chaddha and Quattrocchi in the Howitzer gun deal.
"The continuance of prosecution against Quattrocchi will be unjustified. It is considered expedient in the interest of justice that the proceedings against him should not be continued and be withdrawn," CBI had pleaded in its nine-page application seeking withdrawal of case.
Advocate Ajay Agrawal, who has been pursuing the case in the Supreme Court and had approached the trial court against CBI's move to seek a closure of the case, has contended in the court that the Centre and the agency were trying to close the case despite having sufficient evidence against Quattrocchi.
The plea was countered by the CBI, which said it was difficult to secure presence of Quattrocchi for prosecution and, moreover, all other accused are either dead or charges against them have been quashed by the Delhi high court.