Rediff India Abroad
 Rediff India Abroad Home  |  All the sections

Search:



The Web

India Abroad




Newsletters
Sign up today!

Article Tools
Email this article
Top emailed links
Print this article
Contact the editors
Discuss this article
Home > News > The Ayodhya Issue > Report

ASI or no ASI, temple will be built: VHP

Tara Shankar Sahay in New Delhi | June 11, 2003 19:30 IST

The Vishwa Hindu Parishad on Wednesday insisted that whatever be the result of the excavations carried out by the Archaeological Survey of India in Ayodhya, a temple to Lord Ram will be builtat the disputed site.

VHP leader Surendra Jain told reporters in New Delhi that courts of law are not competent to decide on matters offaith for Hindus.

Jain claimed that the ASI's brief was not to find out whether a temple existed at the disputed site, but whether a mosque hadbeen built there over an existing structure.

"The ASI [interim] report says a mandir has not been found. But bricks are beingdiscovered," he said.

VHP vice-president Giriraj Kishore said 200 representatives of the organisation had assembled at Ayodhya and sworn to construct the Ram temple there.

Kishore claimed that 18 Bharatiya Janata Party members of Parliament were among those who had taken the vow.

He said Bajrang Dal activists would mobilise two crore people in two lakh villages across the country for the construction.

"If Parliament does not enact a law for constructing the temple in Ayodhya during the impending monsoon session, we will launch a massive agitation," Kishore warned.

Jain said the VHP would create an atmosphere in which no political party would dare oppose the temple.

Kishore refused to comment on the Kanchi shankaracharya's recent statements on Ayodhya, saying the VHP did not wish to drag the seer's name in any controversy.

Jain earlier said the inclusion of some Muslim denominations like Ansari, Idrissi, Nadaf, Mansoori and Salmani in(job) reservations had proved hollow the community's claim of every member being equal.

When told that some states had given reservations to backward Muslims under the Mandal Commission category, he saidthat would be 'totally unconstitutional' and termed it an act of minority appeasement.

When his attention was drawn to the en masse conversion of people into Buddhism, Jain said the VHP does not mind it"because Buddhism is a part of Hinduism".


The Ayodhya Issue: The Complete Coverage


Share your comments


 What do you think about the story?




Read what others have to say:


Number of User Comments: 13




Sub: Temple,come what may:VHP

Darwin's theory is still valid today in this pseudo-modern society ,globally.Might is Right. This issue is an eyewash to deviate the voters err general poor ...


Posted by umar





Sub: disgusting

When people are dying of poverty and our country is struggling to make two ends meet people like this can invest such energies and mobilise ...


Posted by antara





Sub: Temple, but no Lord

Even if the temple is built, Lord Rama (or any other God of any religion for that matter) is not going to sit in this ...


Posted by Opendro





Sub: Ignorance

The mosque was demolished saying that it was built in a place where there was a temple...now ASI saya there is no evidence of temple...but ...


Posted by Bimal





Sub: Hey Ram!

May God bless Mr. Giriraj Kishore! On what basis he says that there was a Ram temple earler when there is no proof archeological or ...


Posted by Anamika




Disclaimer

Advertisement






Copyright 2005 Rediff.com India Limited. All Rights Reserved.