Rediff India Abroad
 Rediff India Abroad Home  |  All the sections


The Web

India Abroad

Sign up today!

Article Tools
Email this article
Top emailed links
Print this article
Contact the editors
Discuss this article
Home > Business > PTI > Report

TDSAT clears WLL; moots sops for cell players

August 08, 2003 11:24 IST
Last Updated: August 08, 2003 15:20 IST

In a blow to cellular operators, the Telecom Dispute Settlement and Appellate Tribunal on Friday allowed WLL limited mobile services, but recommended various concessions for the cellular industry to provide a level playing field.

By a majority judgement of two members -- R U S Prasad and P R Dasgupta -- the Tribunal allowed WLL services by basic service providers dismissing cellular operators' petition, but the chairperson Justice D P Wadhwa in his dissenting order set aside the guidelines by which the government granted limited mobility in WLL.

Under the TDSAT Act, the majority verdict prevails.

On the issue of level playing field, the majority judgement said that "since it is a value addition to WLL services which has a definite impact on playing field conditions, we feel that there is enough justification for imposing additional entry fee over and above what they are paying as required under basic license."

They also favoured levying of additional charges for allocation of additional spectrum for WLL services.

The TDSAT, by a majority judgement of 2:1, dismissed the petition filed by cellular operators challenging government's decision to allow wireless in local loop (mobile) services as part of the basic telecom services licence.

The decision of cellular operators to move TDSAT seemed to have been provoked by advertisements by Reliance Infocomm to offer roaming services across 673 cities in India.

The cellular operators had also sought penal action against those WLL operators who were violating their licence terms.

Chairman of TDSAT, Justice D P Wadhwa, was against providing WLL moblie services, while the other two members of the TDSAT bench, R U S Prasad and P D S Dasgupta, agreed to the decision to allow basic service providers to offer WLL mobile services.

The two members, however, pointed out that the starting of the WLL services had created disturbances for cellular operators and thus there was a need to compensate them to offer them a level-playing field.

As per the TDSAT Act, the majority decision prevails.

"We have seen no illegality or arbitrariness in either the procedures followed or, the final decision taken by the government to permit basic service operators to provide limited mobility services as a value added service within the ambit of their licence.

"We also hold that allowing WLL limited mobility in basic service stream does not go against the spirit of the New Telecom Policy, 1999.

"We hold that WLL service with limited mobility will go a long way in increasing the teledensity of the country and making available cheaper and affordable service and benefits accruing from evolving technology which are in conformity with the objectives of NTP, 1999.

"Therefore, allowing WLL service with limited mobility would be in the best interest of the telecom sector and consumers at large in the country."

As long as WLL mobility service is provided as a value added service under fixed service provider licence, the existing distinction between fully mobile cellular mobile service and limited mobile service providers would have to be maintained.

"We are conscious of the fact that allowing WLL service with limited mobility will cause disturbance in the level-playing field, hence we have suggested a number of steps, which should be considered and taken for ensuring level-playing field.

The judgement said, "as a result of what we have discussed earlier, the petitions fail.

"The government would, however, immediately initiate action."

The majority ruling noted that since WLL mobility was a value addition to the WLL service, which has a definite impact on level-playing field conditions, "there was enough justification for imposing additional entry fee over and above what they are paying as required under the basic service licence agreement."

7333: The Latest News on Your Mobile!

© Copyright 2005 PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent.

Share your comments

 What do you think about the story?

Read what others have to say:

Number of User Comments: 5

Sub: TDSAT Clears WLL

Someone please go thro the TRAI site. In the list of registered Cellular or for that matter Basic service Providers, Reliance does not figure. So ...

Posted by Nrupan S.


according to me the wll-m technology though beneficial to the consumers definitely disturbs the cellular operator's business.its not in their best interest but some agreement ...

Posted by rahul

Sub: Cell operators plea dismissed

Why should WLL provide roaming at all ? Then what is the difference btwn WLL & GSM. This whole episode is staged by Reliance who ...

Posted by Rohit Khatter


It is a wise judgement by the Authority since it keeps the customer's benefit as an utmost factor, which leads to rapid development of communication ...

Posted by prabhakar

Sub: Cell operator's plea dismissed

I think there is something going unhidden between Government & Reliance Mobile, a clear picture should be brought, as per the above mentioned subject article, ...

Posted by Kamal



Copyright 2005 India Limited. All Rights Reserved.