"If such blurring gains traction, democracy would be in peril," a bench of Justices Siddharth Mridul and Anup Jairam Bhambhani said in its 83-page judgement while deliberating with the case and imposition of anti-terror law against Kalita.

The top court said there are serious infirmities in the oral accounts of Nirmohi witnesses that the disputed structure was not a mosque but the Janmabhoomi temple.

The court said had the prosecution witnesses not turned hostile, the outcome of the trial would have been different.

Due to the continuous activity of the protesters, the site has virtually become hell for the residents, the Tribunal said.