Underarm serve? When all else fails against Nadal, why not?
When a respected tennis analyst suggested recently that an underarm serve could be an effective weapon in halting Rafael Nadal's annual rampage on clay most just chuckled.
The trouble is that no one seems to have come up with a better plan to the throw the Spaniard off-kilter as he eyes a record-extending 11th French Open title.
The 31-year-old has rarely been a hotter favourite heading into the Roland Garros fortnight.
Apart from Nadal only Roger Federer, Stanislas Wawrinka and Novak Djokovic have got their hands on the Coupe des Mousquetaires since 2005 and Federer will miss this year's tournament while the form of Wawrinka and Djokovic is questionable.
Nadal claimed his 10th French title last year, sweeping through the fortnight without losing a set, taking his career Roland Garros record to an astonishing 79-2.
In Madrid this month he won his 50th consecutive set on clay before Austrian Dominic Thiem finally snapped the year-long sequence, only for Nadal to win the Rome title last weekend.
The truth is when Nadal is fully firing, which can be taken as read in Paris, conventional claycourt combat against the Mallorcan is an exercise in futility.
Yet, with very few exceptions, that is what players attempt to do -- engaging in baseline rallies that inevitably have one outcome and often involve a fair degree of pain.
Once Nadal plants himself two metres behind the baseline and spins his web of forehands, there is no escape.
Which is why Craig O'Shannessy, the ATP's strategy guru, founder of the Brain Game Tennis and tactical advisor to Djokovic, threw out the idea of an underarm serve.
"Some people lost their mind at the suggestion of it," O'Shannessy, who devised Dustin Brown's attacking blitzkrieg that took out Nadal in 2015 at Wimbledon, said.
"The idea was perhaps just throw in one! It goes under the heading of you need to do things that make him uncomfortable, make him think twice, get inside his head."
There is a solid logic to O'Shannessy's argument -- in that Nadal stands a huge distance behind the baseline when receiving on clay, allowing him time to impart massive amounts of topspin and loop on his returns.
"Rafa backs up so far when he's receiving serve he's halfway to Moscow. So an underarm serve? Why not?" O'Shannessy said.
"People think it's illegal. But it's a legit shot. I'm not advocating a player continually doing it because a player like Rafa would adjust. An underarm serve might not win the point, but it throws a curve ball into the match."
"You need an agent of disruption. Perhaps a slow serve and volley, more drop shots. Do something radical."
When Thiem beat Nadal in Madrid he used the higher altitude and thinner air to step in and take the ball much earlier than he usually does -- rushing Nadal and dictating rallies."
It is a tactic Alexander Zverev also used in Rome where he pushed Nadal to three sets in the final.
While the good news is that Thiem proved Nadal is mortal on clay, the bad news, according to three-time French Open champion and Eurosport pundit Mats Wilander, is that this year's Nadal is perhaps the best version yet.
"I see no chinks in his armour really," the Swede said. "He is playing as well as ever. Better technically with his backhand more aggressive. Because of that it frees up his first serve and he can go for more."
"The only chink is that the younger players don't have the same fear factor when playing him. They don't have the baggage."