News APP

NewsApp (Free)

Read news as it happens
Download NewsApp

Available on  gplay

This article was first published 12 years ago
Rediff.com  » News » Thomas moves HC seeking stay on new CVC appointment

Thomas moves HC seeking stay on new CVC appointment

Source: PTI
July 13, 2011 16:19 IST
Get Rediff News in your Inbox:

P J Thomas, whose appointment as Chief Vigilance Commissioner was cancelled by President Pratibha Patil after the Supreme Court held it as illegal, has moved the Delhi high court seeking stay of the appointment of his successor who is being sworn in on Thursday.

In his writ petition filed on Tuesday, Thomas sought a direction to President Pratibha Patil not to issue any warrant of appointment as Chief Vigilance CVC to Defence Secretary Pradeep Kumar without first deciding on his representation to her against the judgment of the Supreme Court.

Thomas in his representation to the president on March 16 had requested her to refer the decision of the apex court to a constitution bench. The president cancelled Thomas's appointment as the central CVC on March 15, 11 days after the apex court order.

Pradeep Kumar, 62, will be sworn-in as the new CVC by President Patil at a ceremony in Rashtrapati Bhavan on Thursday. "The main ground (in the HC petition) is that the decision was delivered by a three-judge bench. We are supporting the mandate of the constitution that it should have been by a five-judge bench," his counsel Wills Matthews said.

"The warrant of appointment of Thomas was cancelled only on the basis of the said judgment. When the legality and the validity of the judgement in itself is disputed it is our humble view that only after reaching conclusion on the legality and validity of the judgment, the respondent (president) should go ahead with the appointment of new CVC," he said.

The Supreme Court had on March 3 quashed the appointment of Thomas as CVC, as a chargesheet was pending against him in a corruption case in Kerala. Thomas was appointed as CVC in September 2010.

The counsel for Thomas cited Article 145 (3) of the Constitution saying those issues connected with the interpretation of the Constitution have to be decided by a minimum five-judge bench.

"The president has also acted on the basis of the said judgment. That is why we sent our reference to her," Matthews said.

 

Get Rediff News in your Inbox:
Source: PTI© Copyright 2024 PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent.
 
India Votes 2024

India Votes 2024