|Rediff India Abroad Home | All the sections|
What ASI has to say about Ram Sethu
Vicky Nanjappa in New Delhi | September 17, 2007 17:14 IST
The blame game on the Ram Sethu issue has begun. The government has assured that the person responsible for filing the affidavit will be dealt with and the entire matter will be re-considered. But will that be enough to put to rest the controversy that rocked the entire nation?
The Archeological Survey of India justifies its stand of not declaring the bridge under the Act as it did not have an occasion to even make a prima facie determination that the said formation could be an ancient monument entitled to protection under the Act. The ASI also claims that it has not undertaken any study in this regard as yet.
Section 3 and 4 of the Act provides for the declaration of a site as an ancient monument of national importance once declared by the Central government. 'Even assuming that a formation or a structure or a building or site is an ancient monument, such fact of being a monument will not automatically deem it to be one of national importance,' says the ASI.
Legal experts point out that Ram Sethu can be protected only if it is brought under the purview of the Act. Even the ASI makes it clear that the power to declare any structure as a protected monument lies only with the Union government.
Not a man made structure:
Another interesting point to note is the reason why the ASI came to the conclusion that Ram Sethu was not a man-made structure. The ASI says that Ram Sethu is a natural formation made up of shoals/sand bars, which are possessed of their particular shape or form due to several millennia of sand action and sedimentation.
Further, the ASI justified its stand of the bridge not being man-made by stating that no human remains have been discovered at the site of the formation known as the Adam's bridge.
Conclusions on Ram Sethu:
After having carried out reconnaissance surveys, bathymetric and sonar studies, sampling and drilling at several locations on the Adam's Bridge, the ASI came to the following conclusions: