Rediff India Abroad
 Rediff India Abroad Home  |  All the sections

Search:



The Web

India Abroad




Newsletters
Sign up today!

Article Tools
Email this article
Top emailed links
Print this article
Contact the editors
Discuss this article


Home > News > Report

Who leaked the Pathak Committee report?



Sheela Bhatt and R Prema in New Delhi | August 05, 2006 01:28 IST

According to government sources, a lawyer with links to the Pathak Committee is alleged to have its report on the Iraq oil-for-food scam to a television news channel.

Sources have said that the journalist who got this report first - allegedly on afloppy disk - is a close relative of the lawyer's.

Even as Justice R S Pathak was at tea with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, the channel flashed as 'breaking news' the information that only the prime minister was supposed to know at that time.

Justice Pathak  has inquired into the United Nation's Volcker Committee report, which had indicted the Congress and former foreign minister Natwar Singh as 'non-contractuary beneficiaries' in the Iraq oil-for-food scam. His report indicts Singh and his son, Jagat and exonerates the Congress party.

Reportedly, it has been now revealed that when Justice Pathak, a former chief  justice of India, took an appointment with the prime minister at 6 pm on August 3, excerpts of the report started to be broadcast.

Finance Minister P Chidambaram, surprised at finding the report being broadcast, understood the gravity of the situation as it has been leaked while Parliament is in session. The minister will be responsible for taking action on the report, if the findings of the committee are accepted by the government.

The Prime Minister's Office has already said that the Pathak report has not been leaked from their premises.

Sudha Pillai, the 1972 batch IAS officer and secretary of the inquiry committee,  is believed to have been interrogated about the leak.

She reportedly has said that she had taken only one printout of the 88-page report and made a photocopy of only the first page to take signatures of Justice Pathak for the record.

One of the accused, Andaleeb Sehgal, had filed a case against the Pathak report being made public. However, the high court has rejected the petition.





Share your comments


 What do you think about the story?




Read what others have to say:


Number of User Comments: 9




Sub: pathak report leakage

it's true that public money is being wasted debating about the leakage, moles, etc.etc., the Opposition parties shall let the govt. initiate immediate action on ...


Posted by shankar goli





Sub: VOLKER

These days media is also piercing into every1's privacy. Is it right? I dunno. If they come to learn .......why to display it b4 the ...


Posted by FAZL UR RAHMAN





Sub: Pathak Report

What is the big deal in the report becoming public? why is it that the corrupt politicians should know it first ? so that they ...


Posted by RKK





Sub: Disgusting!

The "leak" is even more disgusting than the scam itself. Mr Justice Pathak says, the "leak" did not come from the Inquiry Authority. Government says, ...


Posted by Cogito_erg0...





Sub: Democracy leaks to throw out demonocracy!

Thanks to whoever leaked it, we are sure the government will be forced to act however bitter it may be for those who are at ...


Posted by Gururaj




Disclaimer

Advertisement






Copyright © 2006 Rediff.com India Limited. All Rights Reserved.