| Rediff India Abroad Home | All the sections | |
Nano or no Nano, Left will suffer September 09, 2008 Just when we thought the Singur impasse was over, a statement by Tata Motors [Get Quote] dashed West Bengal's hope of getting the Nano factory back to work. Minutes after reports from West Bengal hinted that the Singur issue had finally resolved with Tata Motors 'agreeing to give land,' the Tatas expressed distress at the 'limited clarity on the outcome of the discussions between the state government of West Bengal and the representatives of the agitators in Singur.' Hence, uncertainty still looms large even after West Bengal Chief Minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee struck an 'amicable' deal with the firebrand Opposition supreme Mamata Banerjee at a marathon meet at Kolkata's Raj Bhavan on Sunday. As a direct consequence of the meeting, Banerjee agreed to call off the indefinite stir 'temporarily' at Singur while the chief minister promised to compensate the 'unwilling' sellers of land as demanded by Banerjee. Both sides seemed happy till they heard the Tata Motors announcement. Will the Tatas shift the Nano factory out of Bengal? A million-dollar question, indeed. Whatever be the end result, Singur's Nano factory will ever be remembered for more than one reason: the controversy it brewed as also for bringing to light the hitherto unexposed pro-industrialisation aspect of our 'beloved' comrades. As for the people of the state, a huge section of the population feels if Tatas leave Singur it will deal a severe blow to the West Bengal's already negative image whereas there are quite a few others who think the issue is not of as much importance as it is being hyped out to be. I have no qualms in admitting that I belong to the second group. For, an agitation threatening the existence of a factory is a regular occurrence in this Left-ruled state. Within a 25-km radius of our ancestral home in Kolkata, at least 15 (if not more) factories became defunct in the last 15 years -- thanks to stir by Left-backed trade unions. Many ex-workers, it is heard, committed suicide and many families turned pauper overnight in the post lock-out period. One of my paternal uncles had to confront abject poverty when he lost a cushy and well-paying job at the Usha factory in south Kolkata. One fine morning, the factory was declared closed and its staff sent home. None of them got any compensation whatsoever. My uncle, aunt and their grown-up daughters became dependent on their kin. Wish (Mamata) Banerjee were there then. Wish her idiosyncrasies (please don't assume that I am her fan) were as effective that time. After all, she was not asking for any classified information to be leaked. Neither was she eager to know the technical know-how of Nano. Was it arrogance, adamance or sheer negligence? Or are we to suppose what Banerjee has been alleging during her long dharna at Singur was true? Was there some foul play in the land deal? More Guest Columns | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||