| Rediff India Abroad Home | All the sections | |
3 common mutual fund misconceptions February 12, 2008 12:04 IST Few would dispute the utility that mutual funds as investment avenues can add to investors' portfolios. Similarly, in recent times, the greater acceptance of mutual funds and their impressive showing in the domestic context has been chronicled in detail. There is also a huge amount of information available on how to invest in mutual funds and make the most of them. Sadly, little is being done to remove the several misconceptions doing the rounds. Thanks to these misconceptions, investors end up making incorrect investment decisions. In this article, we expose three common mutual fund misconceptions. SIP is an investment avenue The fact: SIP is a mode of investment, not an investment avenue. The conventional method of mutual fund investing entails making one-time lump sum investments. SIP investing involves making regular investments in a staggered manner. By spreading the investments over longer time frames (at least 12-24 months), investors stand to gain by lowering the average purchase cost vis-�-vis lump sum investments. This is most evident when equity markets experience prolonged bouts of turbulence. Also, SIP investing tends to be lighter on the wallet as opposed to lump sum investing. 'Since inception' numbers are comparable The fact: 'Since inception' performances are not comparable, simply because not all funds have the same inception date. For example, a diversified equity fund launched in 1995 can be compared with another fund launched in 2002 over the 3-Yr and 5-Yr time frames. However comparing their 'since inception' performances would be inappropriate because the first fund has a 13-Yr track record while the latter has been in existence for 6 years. A fund's performance since its inception can at best be considered for drawing comparisons vis-�-vis the benchmark index (i.e. by considering a corresponding period) to evaluate its relative performance. Thematic funds make good investments The fact: All the hype surrounding thematic funds doesn't change the fact that they are high risk-high return investment propositions. Furthermore, such funds can deliver only so long as the underlying theme does well; once the theme runs out of steam (every theme does at some point in time), so does the fund. And given the restrictive investment mandate of a thematic fund, the fund manager has no option but to stay invested even in the aforementioned scenario. Conversely, there are diversified equity funds that invest in an unrestricted manner. By not being tied down to any specific theme, they are free to seek attractive investment opportunities across the investment universe. Statistics reveal that over longer time frames (more than 5 years) well-managed diversified equity funds are known to score over their thematic peers. More importantly, diversified equity funds are known to outscore their thematic peers on the risk parameters i.e. they expose investors to lower risk levels. At best, thematic funds are suited for informed investors who can time their entry into and exit from the fund. Retail investors should stick to diversified equity funds with proven track records over longer time frames and across market phases. Easy steps to tax planning. Get your free guide today! Click here! ![]() More Personal Finance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||