Rediff India Abroad
 Rediff India Abroad Home  |  All the sections

Search:



The Web

India Abroad




Newsletters
Sign up today!

Article Tools
Email this article
Top emailed links
Print this article
Contact the editors
Discuss this article
Home > Cricket > Special


The Rediff Special/rediff Features Desk

BCCI battle: The how and why

September 26, 2005

The election to the Board of Control for Cricket in India is up against more legal hurdles.

On Monday, the Rajasthan Cricket Association, the Bihar Cricket Association and Tamil Nadu's Netaji Cricket Club filed a petition in the Supreme Court challenging the removal of two additional observers -- K N Singh and M M Punchi -- for the BCCI election.

The petition also sought that the Board election be held before September 30.

The Rajasthan Cricket Association, represented by Lalit Modi, was the only member that did not sign the resolution passed on Friday after the AGM was adjourned for two months.

'We want transparency in the election process,' Modi had said then.

If all this has left you stumped, here are some quick answers to clear the air:

What do the petitioners want this time?

"Intricate legal issues will be raised (to disqualify voters) during the AGM. The petitioners (to the Supreme Court) want that thecourt should appoint a panel to oversee the elections," says a source close to the proceedings.

Critics of the Board's patron Jagmohan Dalmiya allege he runs the BCCI like his fiefdom and that often when members raise questions, they are not answered satisfactorily.

The present BCCI chairman, Ranbir Singh Mahendra, is perceived by them as a Dalmiya puppet.

Why were the additional observers appointed?

If the election had been held on Friday, the three observers would have had the power to disqualify voting associations. Besides the issue of Bihar and Jharkhand --both associations claim voting rights as separate states -- the Uttar Pradesh Cricket Association and the Rajasthan Cricket Association stand the risk of being disqualified on technicalities.

Both the Dalmiya camp and the challenger Sharad Pawar camp have a delicate balance of numbers, and even one member being disqualified would have meant uncertainty over victory.

Hence, the Pawar camp got the additional observers appointed through a legal battle.

Then why were they dismissed?

They were dismissed, again through a legal battle in the Calcutta high court, by the Dalmiya camp. Insiders say Pawar, being the political heavyweight he is, would not have joined the BCCI battle for the second time unless he was doubly sure of his chances.

Last September too, Pawar had run for Board president, only to see Dalmiya get the Maharashtra Cricket Association nominee disqualified. And Dalmiya's man was allowed to vote from the RCA, disqualifying Modi.

The Dalmiya camp's move of getting the additional observers ousted through a court battle this year signalled a similar trend.

What was the 'compromise formula'?

The BCCI resolution, read out by Mahendra, said Pawar and his nominee N Srinivasan, would be included in the marketing committee. It had set tongues wagging: that Pawar had agreed to a draw with concessions to him.

But the RCA's petition -- Modi is, in his words, 'definitely Pawar camp' -- makes it clear that while the Union agriculture minister might be willing to wave the white flag, his soldiers are not.

And if you are wondering why the whole hullabaloo over governing a game, the reason is what motivates most bitter battles: money.

On an average year, cricket generates about Rs 6.5 billion advertisement revenue.

The BCCI's internal mess has led to sponsors becoming increasingly irritated.

Also read
No secret formula: Bindra
BCCI big fight: blow by blow


More Specials

Share your comments


 What do you think about the story?




Read what others have to say:


Number of User Comments: 13




Sub: Make Ganguly life time captain

The long lasting solution of the ongoing ugly scene is to make Ganguly life time captain of Indian and the coach must be issued standing ...


Posted by Frankly





Sub: Shame on All jokers involved in this fiasco

Dalmiya, Ganguly, Mahendra and the Most Respected excricketers - Jokers of the Century. Either they are uneducated to see that a rift was there or ...


Posted by sb





Sub: Dalmiyas private company BCCI ?

It's quite some time that BCCI is working under Dalmiyas dictatorship. I guess he would have printed "CEO & Owner" of BCCI (privately owned company ...


Posted by Raj





Sub: Its time to be professional

The email sent by Chappel should not have been leaked. Coach is doing right thing by looking towards Captain as a player. If he is ...


Posted by Yash





Sub: BCI Battle : The how and why

I think we the cricket fans should start writing a new book " TO HELL WITH CRICKET" Any EX cricketer can be the author ! ...


Posted by Joe Britto




Disclaimer


Advertisement






Copyright 2005 Rediff.com India Limited. All Rights Reserved.