HOME   
   NEWS   
   BUSINESS   
   CRICKET   
   SPORTS   
   MOVIES   
   NET GUIDE   
   SHOPPING   
   BLOGS  
   ASTROLOGY  
   MATCHMAKER  


Search:



The Web

Rediff








News
Capital Buzz
Commentry
Dear Rediff
Diary
Elections
Interviews
Specials
Gallery
The States



Home > US Edition > The Gulf War II > Report

It was Saddam: Lt Gen (retd) K S Randhawa

Onkar Singh in New Delhi | April 05, 2003 00:37 IST


Iraqi President Saddam Hussein called the bluff of the Americans, who were of the view that he had died in a missile attack on the first day of the bombing on Baghdad, by walking on the streets of the capital on Friday evening.

Television channels across the world broadcast video clips of the Iraqi leader walking amongst his delirious people.

Western analysts appeared taken aback by Hussein's appearance in public, mingling with his people, talking to them, and at one point of time even holding aloft a child.

Some doubted it was Hussein, saying it might have been one of his look-alikes.

Lt General (retd) Kirpal Singh Randhawa, who had imparted training to Iraqi troops in the seventies, was convinced that the man shown on television networks was none other than the Iraqi president.

"I recognise three of his bodyguards and they were right there with their leader. This courageous and bold move could electrify the Arab world, particularly the people of Baghdad," Randhawa told rediff.com on phone late on Friday night.

Saddam's personal appearance in public could motivate Iraqis to even sacrifice their lives for defence of their motherland, he said.

Asked why the Iraqis let the Americans easily capture Baghdad airport, Randhawa said it could have been a strategic move on their part.

"Saddam Hussein wants the Americans to fight the battle on the streets of Baghdad. He would not want to waste his tanks and armoured personnel carriers in open warfare. He would like to personally direct the battle of Baghdad," he said.

General Randhawa said that the battle for Baghdad could be one of the bloodiest in the history of modern warfare.

"I would say that the Americans and the British would lose at least a couple of thousand troops even if they skirt street-to-street battle and depend heavily on aerial bombing."

"But if they go in for street battles, the toll could be much higher," he said.




Article Tools

Email this Article

Printer-Friendly Format

Letter to the Editor



Related Stories


Iraq warns of non-conventional attack

'Saddam will never surrender'

History's most unpopular war








HOME   
   NEWS   
   BUSINESS   
   CRICKET   
   SPORTS   
   MOVIES   
   NET GUIDE   
   SHOPPING   
   BLOGS  
   ASTROLOGY  
   MATCHMAKER  
© 2003 rediff.com India Limited. All Rights Reserved.