The Web


Home > News > The Ayodhya Issue > Report

Muslims deserted the disputed structure in Ayodhya: Centre

June 06, 2003 01:40 IST

Muslims had 'deserted' the disputed structure in Ayodhya since 1934 and no prayers were offered by the community after it was completely 'abandoned', the Centre told the Liberhan Commission on Thursday.

"It (disputed structure) was a deserted and abandoned structure because Muslims were not allowed either to go inside it or because of their own fear. They had completely deserted it in 1934 or at least in 1936," Centre's counsel Lala Ram Gupta told the Commission, which is probing the demolition of the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya on December 6, 1992.

He said probably the Muslims were 'ousted' from the site.

Gupta maintained the idols, which were being worshipped in the outer courtyard (Ram Chabutra) of the disputed site, were not placed in the disputed structure in 1934 or 1936.

He, however, said it was an 'admitted fact' that when communal riots occurred during the period leading to damage to the structure, the cost of repair was borne by the Hindus.

To query from the commission that the Muslims have referred to a December 10, 1949 report of a Wakf Inspector to claim the possession of the disputed structure, the Centre's counsel said, "This is a report of an employee of a Wakf given to the Wakf and cannot be taken as a word of evidence and hence it is inadmissible."    

He elaborated his arguments by referring to another report of a Wakf Inspector filed on December 22, 1949 that spoke about the situation on that particular day and not anything about the placing of idols in the disputed structure on December 23.

Gupta said that according to Wakf Inspector Mohammed Ibrahim, Muslims were allowed to offer namaz only on Friday for two hours. He contended that there is no evidence that the Muslims continued to offer namaz inside the disputed structure.

He claimed that an affidavit filed by a Muslim before the Faizabad Magistrate in 1949 said that the mosque was built after destruction of the Ram temple.

The Ayodhya Issue: The Complete Coverage

Share your comments

 What do you think about the story?

Read what others have to say:

Number of User Comments: 7

Sub: Muslims left Ayodhya site

I do not understand how the Hindus can claim that Ayodhya was the place where Rama was born, when Ramayana itself is a myth. In ...

Posted by Jacob Cherian

Sub: Silence

Liberal, secular Mushlim should come forward and prove they are against the fundamentalist force and are genuine. Your silence puts you on the side of ...

Posted by Vinay

Sub: Mandir-Masjid

Why liberal Muslim don't take this issue publically. Are they united or scared ?

Posted by Vinay

Sub: Proof ?

Is there any Proof that the Ram temple was there and the Babri Mosque was built up after Ram temple distruction ????????????? Please stop killing ...

Posted by Atta

Sub: When will we start thinking beyond religion.

11 years back as a school-boy I took great interest in the contoversy. Now it is really toooo (I put the extra o's intentionally) much. ...

Posted by Chakravarthy Akella


Article Tools
Email this article
Top emailed links
Print this article
Write us a letter
Discuss this article

Related Stories

No dispute over Ram's birthplace

Hindus trying to liberate Ayodhya

Ayodhya: Remove ASI head: Court

People Who Read This Also Read

BJP chief gets angry

'We will never lower our guard'

India, US to discuss L-1 visa

Copyright © 2005 India Limited. All Rights Reserved.