Rediff India Abroad
 Rediff India Abroad Home  |  All the sections

Search:



The Web

India Abroad




Newsletters
Sign up today!

Article Tools
Email this article
Top emailed links
Print this article
Contact the editors
Discuss this article
Home > News > Columnists > T V R Shenoy

The struggle against venality

April 09, 2003

Have you ever had a bureaucrat asking you for a 'sweetener' just to do his job? And, of course, we all take it for granted that the average politician is up to his elbow in graft. Tales of corruption are staple reading for every Indian. The sole light at the end of the tunnel seemed to be the judiciary.

So, let us turn away from the battles in Baghdad, and concern ourselves with a war closer home -- the struggle against venality. Happily, honest citizens have powerful allies in this battle, none less than the President and the Chief Justice of India themselves. So, how did they come to be involved?

Some months ago, the Central Bureau of Investigation started investigating allegations of large-scale wrongdoing in the Delhi Development Authority. Controlling as it does large chunks of land in the capital of India, this body is a virtual magnet for the corrupt.

A key suspect was a middleman called Dharamveer Singh Khattar. When the CBI finally decided to net the fish, raiding the homes of certain officers, it found illegal assets reputedly worth crores of rupees. But what even the CBI's worldly-wise officers did not expect to find was evidence suggesting that the scam might involve persons in the Delhi high court.

The CBI reputedly found 20or so Delhi high court files in Khattar's possession when they searched his house, documents that had no business being there. While the investigating officers have been, understandably, circumspect on just what these files contained, I understand that most -- if not all -- the cases concernedare being heard by a particular judge.

The CBI director was so disturbed at what his officers had found that he decided to ask for advice from the Chief Justice of India. He, in turn, lost no time; after some quick consultations with certain senior colleagues, he summoned the chief justice of the Delhi high court to appraise him of the developments. The sequel was not long in coming; on the next working day, it was announced that Justice Shamit Mukherjee, an additional judge of the Delhi high court, had resigned his post.

By now, rumours of the files found in Khattar's house were floating around Delhi. Inevitably, journalists asked Justice Mukherjee if he were involved in any manner with the Delhi Development Authority scandal. The judge denied any links.

Meanwhile, Justice Mukherjee's letter of resignation had been sent for approval to the President of India. The normal procedure on such occasions is for the head of state to approve as a matter of course. Fortunately, President Kalam is an unconventional man. His response was to raise a fundamental principle: if a judge were truly involved in such a scam, was it enough to let him resign? Would there be no further action?

A judge is entitled to a certain amount of protection while he continues to occupy the Bench. But that ceases automatically from the momenthe quits that seat.

Justice Mukherjee subsequently announcedhe had 'withdrawn' his resignation. However, the Union law ministry feelsthat Justice Mukherjee isn't entitled to change his mind in this fashion. He had not specified any date for his resignation to come into force, and it therefore came into force with immediate effect.

I understandthe Bar has taken thematter very seriously, asking for a complete investigation of the scandal. There is now no reason why the CBI should hesitate to conduct the most searching enquiry. The officers are now assured of backing from the Bar, the Chief Justice of India and his colleagues, and the President himself.

One might wonder why it was necessary for the Presidentto ask whether even judges shouldn't face the consequences of their actions. But for now let us rejoice that he did do so, and that the Chief Justice and his brethren responded nobly. In the midst of all the bad news, it is good to know that the highest in the land share our concerns about corruption in high places.


T V R Shenoy


Share your comments


 What do you think about the story?




Read what others have to say:


Number of User Comments: 42




Sub: Cheers President!

It was a nice written article, although the matter was nothing new. Believe me, this case will be hot and dragged for another 2-3 months ...


Posted by Raghavendra Udupa





Sub: Corruption

Corruption has grown too much due to political patronage; time high and mighty are punished more severely than rest; if fence starts eating the crop, ...


Posted by VALLI





Sub: RE:Positive attitude

To CowSlaughterer: I find your e-mail ID extremely offensive! Look at the no. of messages who have taken AB to task for making a crass ...


Posted by Abid Husain





Sub: RE:Positive attitude

CowSlaughterer, yr e-mail Id is also in extremely poor taste. No, not because it says "Cow" but because it says Slaughterer alongwith it. If you ...


Posted by Rahul Joshi





Sub: RE:Positive attitude

AB, were ur remarks meant to be a joke? If so, it was a joke in extremely bad taste. Kindly dessit from making such cheap ...


Posted by Naina Dhar




Disclaimer

Advertisement






Copyright 2005 Rediff.com India Limited. All Rights Reserved.