« Back to articlePrint this article

Taliban culture not okay in India, say ABVP leaders who quit

February 18, 2016 12:26 IST

In a stinging letter, the three wrote, ‘We cannot be mouthpiece of such a government which has unleashed oppression on student community’.

Police stop activists from the ABVP as they try to cross a barricade during a protest against the students of Jawaharlal Nehru University outside the university campus. Photograph: Anindito Mukherjee/Reuters

There should be no Taliban culture in India and the law should be allowed to take its course, say Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad office-bearers who have resigned from the party in protest against the Centre’s handling of the raging row at Jawaharlal Nehru University and “legitimising” actions of right wing fascist forces.

“JNU is the most nationalist institution in the country. I do not support the government’s stand over the issue. Let Supreme Court find Kanhaiya guilty and award him life imprisonment. But let the law take its course. There should be no ‘Taliban culture’ in India,” said Pradeep Narwal, former joint secretary of JNU unit of ABVP.

Pradeep Narwal, joint secretary of JNU unit of ABVP, Rahul Yadav, president of ABVP unit of JNU’s School of Social Sciences and its secretary Ankit Hans, had on Wednesday resigned from the Bharatiya Janata Party student wing, saying they “cannot be mouthpiece of such a government which has unleashed oppression on student community”.

“We are going to fight for JNU. If law finds Kanhaiya guilty, let him be punished. If Umar Khalid is guilty he should be jailed. But do not attack the entire university, students and teachers. Let there be space for voices of dissent,” he added.

Ankit Hans, said, “We had ideological differences with the party over the issue so we decided to disassociate ourselves. We want to stand for the university as students and not political leaders of an outfit, whose stand is not acceptable to us”.

While the ABVP senior leaders are claiming that the three students have been “influenced” to protest against the party and divert the whole issue, Hans said, “This is our individual decision. We have not done this under anybody’s influence.       

In a hard-hitting resignation letter, the trio had on Wednesday said, “We think there is a difference between interrogation and crushing ideology and branding entire left as anti-national. We cannot be mouthpiece of such a government which has unleashed oppression on student community.

“Every day we see people assemble at front gate with the Indian flag to beat JNU students, well this is hooliganism not nationalism, you can’t do anything in the name of nation, and there is a difference between nationalism and hooliganism”.

The three students, however, maintained that they will not join the ongoing strike by the students demanding release of JNUSU President Kumar.

He was arrested on Friday last in connection with a case of sedition and criminal conspiracy registered over holding of the event at the varsity during which anti-India slogans were alleged to have been raised.

Members of the ABVP had objected to holding of the event following which the vice chancellor had withdrawn the permission for it. However, the organisers had gone ahead with the event.

© Copyright 2022 PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent.