There has been an outcry from sections of the capital markets on the Sebi move to restrict the flow of money through the participatory note route. Market experts are divided on the steps (including the timing of the move) suggested by the capital market regulator, which has given the participants as little as four days to send their feedback. It is likely that most of the recommendations will be approved by the Sebi board, which is meeting next Thursday.
Rajesh Abraham gives a snapshot of the arguments for and against various aspects of Sebi's move:
Timing
FOR:
The timing of the move was not right. The markets will crash.
AGAINST: Stocks have moved at a frenzied pace since the Fed rate cut last month. If this is not the right time to curb the 'anonymous money' flowing into the capital markets, then when? Anyway, most of the PN money is coming into stocks that are not in the blue-chip category. This means the source of the money is questionable and the investments are not driven by fundamentals.
Delays in FII registrations and high costs
FOR: There is a huge delay in registering FIIs.The costs are also high. Sebi has to speed up the process of registrations.
AGAINST: There are over 1,100 FIIs registered in the country and the number is getting bigger. Even if the costs are higher and registrations slow, there is nothing stopping these anonymous investors from buying and selling through any one of the 1,100-plus