Rediff.com
  July 17, 2002 
 Home > Movies > Features   Feedback 
  SECTIONS
  Box Office
Columns
Features
Interviews
List
Memories
Reviews
Short Takes
Slide Shows
Southern Spice
Specials
Search Rediff




  Fabulous Offers!

  CDs @ Rs. 90/-

  Laurel & Hardy
  - VCDs
  Rs. 125/- only..

  Tom & Jerry
 - VCDs: Rs. 125/-



 Secrets every
 mother should
 know



 Your Lipstick
 talks!



 Jeeyo, magar
 SHAAN se!


 Search the Internet
           Tips
 Sites: Actresses, Actors
E-Mail this feature to a friend
Print this page Best Printed on  HP Laserjets



Pahlaj Nihalani
'Film quality bad, but TV gives wrong picture!'
AMPTPP head Pahlaj Nihalani's war against the media

Ronjita Kulkarni

The tussle between the media and the Association of Motion Pictures and Television Programme Producers (AMPTPP) continues. The latter claims the media is responsible for the poor box-office collections of films. The media points fingers at the poor quality of films today.

In recent times, only a handful of films have had good openings --- Vikram Bhatt's Awara Paagal Deewana, Abbas-Mustan's Humraaz and Sanjay Leela Bhansali's Devdas.

While the Shah Rukh Khan-Madhuri Dixit-Aishwarya Rai starrer Devdas received mixed reviews, the film has been declared a hit already. But this has not diluted the controversy, as the apex body of producers takes a more aggressive stand.

AMPTPP, headed by Talaash producer Pahlaj Nihalani, states that television ruins the box-office prospects of a film by predicting wrongly. "People do not get a chance to decide for themselves if they want to see a film," he says. "Television feeds them with everything, so even the curiosity dies down. They influence the people by giving them the wrong picture and that affects the box-office."

The success of Devdas in spite of mixed reviews does not daunt him. "When Ramesh Sippy's Sholay released in 1975, it got mixed reviews. People called it Cholay! But it became a blockbuster. The same goes for Aditya Chopra's Mohabbatein, Karan Johar's Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham and the recent Devdas. The reason why they did well was because they were big films and there was a lot of curiosity attached to it. Unfortunately, medium budget films do not enjoy this."

    Recent Features
The man who almost gave
    verse to Devdas
Hanks no match for Smith
Readers take on Devdas
All-star clash at US BO?
Madhuri enthralls
Amol Palekar resigns
MIB-II reels in the green
Pooja Bhatt on Sur, ESIF
Mira's new muse
'Humraaz will not go bust'
Priyanka: A world of good
Vikram: On to Footpath
Akshaye's dark side

MORE FEATURES

Nihalani mainly points fingers at television and radio, as the print media 'does not enjoy such a wide coverage'. Also, television airs film's software, which the producer gives them at no cost. The clips are aired repeatedly, reducing curiosity value. "The question is that if the media misuses our software, why should we supply it to them? We have to see our interests first, then others'."

With the entry of so many radio stations and new technology, the music industry has changed a lot. According to Nahalani, for the worse. "The radio stations air entire songs. They do not take permission nor give royalty to the music companies or producers. Now, if people like a song, they will simply record it, instead of buying the album. That affects our music sales."

Nihalani states that earlier, even bad films did business. Now that has long since stopped.

AMPTTP is also against reviews appearing in trade magazines. AMPTTP spokesperson Anil Nagrath stated that the reviews were very vicious and reviewers aimed at killing films. He hoped to take action against this issue. Nihalani does not mind reviews in trade magazines, but claims the media must not publicise these reviews. "Trade magazines are not meant for the public. They are the internal industry material to help exhibitors and distributors. We publish film figures in these magazines to help exhibitors and distributors buy the film. They serve as guides. The media should not take our internal information and circulate it."

Nihalani admits, "I do agree the content of the films has deteriorated. The Association will take adequate steps to ensure that the films improve. But frankly, directors, producers and actors determine the content. A director will only direct a film if he feels the content is worth it. It is creative freedom. Similarly, we cannot force actors to sign a film, if they do not want to. They sign only those films which they think are good. The producer invests so much money. Naturally, he would choose a good film."

Meanwhile, the Association is holding numerous meetings and hopes to arrive at a solution by this week.

dot
Channels:

News:
Shopping:
Services:
Astrology | Auctions | Auto | Contests | Destinations | E-cards | Food | Health | Home & Decor | Jobs/Intl.Jobs | Lifestyle | Matrimonial
Money | Movies | Net Guide | Product Watch | Romance | Tech.Edu | Technology | Teenstation | Women
News | Cricket | Sports | NewsLinks
Shopping | Books | Music
Personal Homepages | Free Email | Free Messenger | Chat
dot
rediff.com
(c) 2002 rediff.com India Limited. All Rights Reserved.