Rediff Logo
Channels: Astrology | Broadband | Chat | Contests | E-cards | Money | Movies | Romance | Weather | Wedding | Women
Partner Channels: Auctions | Auto | Bill Pay | Education | Jobs | Lifestyle | TechJobs | Technology | Travel
Home > Cricket > News > Report
November 28, 2000

 -  News
 -  Betting Scandal
 -  Schedule
 -  Database
 -  Statistics
 -  Interview
 -  Conversations
 -  Columns
 -  Gallery
 -  Broadband
 -  Match Reports
 -  Archives
 -  Search Rediff

 Search the Internet

E-Mail this report to a friend


221. Dr. Irani also stated as under before the CBI regarding a match played in 1997 in West Indies.

"I (sic) quite another instance where I had suspected that that match was deliberately lost, relates to a match played in the West Indies in 1997. The Indian team had to make only a few runs but inspite of a number of wickets they could not make them and from the manner in which the team was playing, it raised suspicion. After the match some of the boys blamed the loss due to "a silly excuse" like "Voodoo" being practiced by some locals on the field, which distracted them".

222. Regarding this, Dr. Irani stated before me that he also felt that the Indian team losing the match came about because India did not play to its potential. Otherwise he confirmed that he stated as above.

223. Once again, it will be seen that from a positive suspicion of match fixing which he conveyed to CBI, he watered it down in the statement recorded by me as India not playing to its potential which could also mean that India was not in form that day. From the demeanour of Dr. Irani, I am not inclined to accept the revised version which Dr. Irani stated before me.

224. Before the CBI, Dr. Irani categorically stated that he was not aware of the alleged offer of Rs. 25 lakhs made by Kapil Dev to Manoj Prabhakar.

225. Dr. Irani fully confirmed this before me also.

226. Before the CBI, Dr. Irani stated as under regarding M.K. "On being asked whether I knew M.K. Gupta, I state that I do not know any such person. Today you have shown me a photograph of M.K. Gupta and I state that this person had been introduced to me by Azhar as 'John' and not as 'M.K. Gupta', in a Test match in Ahmedabad in 1996. I further state that in the Indian Team Nayan Mongia and Manoj Prabhakar were good friends so were Azhar and Ajay Jadeja and Sidhu and Manoj Prabhakar. Initially, Ajay Jadeja was very close to Manoj Prabhakar. I had often seen Azhar and Ajay Jadeja talking in hushed tones and very often I had doubted that their conversation related to some hanky-panky in the matches".

227. Before me regarding this, Dr. Irani stated as under: "Regarding M.K. Gupta, it is a fact that I do not know him. Once when Azhar had gone out for a dinner, he telephoned from that place and told me that he was getting delayed and that some one would come and deliver a parcel for him which I was to collect and give to Azhar when he came back. After some time, a person came, introduced himself as John and delivered a sports bag for being given to Azharuddin. When Azharuddin returned, he collected the bag from me. I did not know what the bag contained. When CBI showed the photograph of the person who the CBI said was MK, I then told them that this may be the person who came as John and delivered the sports bag on that day. I may add here that as I mostly remain in room and the players have used to go out, parcels, articles, letters etc., for all the team very often used to be delivered in my room and the team players used to collect them later.

'It is correct that I told the CBI that in the Indian team, Nayan Mongia and Manoj Prabhakar were good friends and so were Azharuddin, Ajay Jadeja, Sidhu and Manoj Prabhakar. I was friendly with all the players.

'It is not correct that I told the CBI that I have often seen Azhar and Ajay Jadeja talking in hushed tones and very often I had doubted that their conversation related to hanky-panky in the matches."

228. The further statement recorded by me of Dr. Irani necessiated reproduction of certain parts of his statement made by him before CBI. It is therefore, convenient to reproduce below the statement of Dr. Irani before me in this regard.

"14). Now you have read out to me the following portions in my statement as recorded by the CBI.

15). Later, when Azhar became more close to me he opened up with me and asked me to collect money on his behalf. I told Azhar that I could not collect money on his behalf but if someone gave money for him (Azhar) to me in my room I will tell him (Azhar). Azhar then told me that 'John' would give me money and then this person 'John' and his representative (a guy from Bombay) gave me money for Azhar on a number of occasions. I will not be able to tell about the identity of the other person as he was never introduced to me by John. Azhar would ring me or tell me in advance that John would be sending money. I further state that I would not say how much money must have been transferred by John to Azhar but each transaction was in lakhs and some transactions were as high as Rs. 10 to 15 lakhs. For rendering this service Azhar used to pay me anywhere from Rs. 25,000/- to Rs. 50,000/- on each occasion. I may further state that although I was a conduit for transfer of money from John to Azhar, I did on each occasion tell Azhar that what he (Azhar) was doing was not correct. However, my greed to be with the Indian Team as a physiotherapist got the better off me.

16). On being asked as to which other players were involved with Azhar, I state that Ajay Jadeja, Nayan Mongia, Manoj Prabhakar (not playing now) were also involved with Azhar in this matter. I further state that I had absolutely no (doubt) about the involvement of Ajay Jadeja with Azhar as in 1996 during a one day match, Ajay Jadeja told me, not to talk about such things to him as he was no longer into it. He said this to me since Ajay knew by that time that Azhar had confided in me as to what was happening. I may further state that the bookies normally approached the players individually and that even, often two players would not realise that they had been approached by the same bookie.

I state that I did not give such a statement to CBI at all. The only thing I told the CBI was that on another occasion some one else also had left a bag in my house for Azhar and within an hour Azhar's driver came and collected. I do not know what the bag contained."

229. In the statement recorded by CBI Dr. Irani had also stated as under: "I state that if one studies the body language of the players after a match then one can at times realise that a particular player was involved in match fixing. There have been occasions that when the Indian team had won, some players had not been happy after the match. In fact, in a match against Pakistan during 'Independence Cup', the Indian team had won, but when the camera focussed on Azhar he did not appear happy. Noticing this, the camera remained focussed on him for a reasonably long time."

230. He more or less confirmed this in the statement recorded by me as under:

"17). As I am not a psychiatrist, I cannot always say from the body language of a player after the match that a particular player was involved in match fixing. It is however correct that I told CBI that in a match against Pakistan during Independence Cup in 1997, the Indian team had won, but when the camera focused on Azhar, he did not appear happy. Due to this, the camera remained focussed on Azhar for a long time. In fact, the other players had seen it first and drawn my attention to it."

231. Before the CBI, Dr. Irani also stated that during the later stages his relationship with Azhar came under stress because he has objected to his association with Sangeeta Bijlani and also objected to his above said activities.

232. Regarding the above, Dr. Irani gave a different version before me, which is reproduced below:

"In 1994 I gave a confidential report to the Secretary, BCCI in which I mentioned that when a team meeting was going on, Azharuddin who was captain of the team, was speaking to Sangeeta Bijlani on phone. Azharuddin came to know about this and our relationship soured. It became worse in 1995 when I told him not to divorce his wife for marrying Sangeeta Bijlani. In fact I did not attend his wedding."

233. Dr. Irani also told CBI as under:

"I may further state that often one could tell from the reaction of the players in the Team Meeting prior to the match about their performance. This was specially true in the case of Manoj Prabhakar and N.S. Sidhu Whenever they spoke a lot in the Team Meeting it could be known that they were not going to score, much."

234. He more or less confirmed this before me though the language used by him (at Para 19 of his statement) was different.

235. In the CBI statement Dr. Irani had spoken well about Tendulkar as a capable batsman against whom Dr. Irani had heard nothing adverse also. In the statement recorded by him also Dr. Irani took the same stand.

236. Dr. Irani also stated as under before the CBI:

"On being asked about the involvement of underworld in match fixing and betting specially with reference to the involvement of Sharad Shetty I state that although I do not have any first hand knowledge, however, once Azhar had told me that as he (Azhar) was already doing matches with Anees Ibrahim, he (Azhar) would not do so with anyone else."

237. Regarding the above, Dr. Irani stated before me that he did not state as above before the CBI.

238. CBI has analysed the evidence against Dr. Ali Irani at Pages 123-124. In the analysis, CBI has relied not only what Dr. Irani stated before CBI but also on the statement of M.K. which is placed at Pages 065-075 of Vol.-II.

239. M.K. had stated before CBI that Azharuddin had introduced him to Dr. Irani during the Ahmedabad Test against South Africa in 1996. Dr. Irani admitted before CBI that he was introduced to M.K. by Azharuddin, but he knew M.K. only as John.

240. M.K. has further stated that Azharuddin had directed him to make payments towards the matches he 'did' for M.K. through Dr. Irani. M.K. also stated before CBI that on some occasion, money to Azhar was paid through Dr. Irani. Dr. Irani also admitted before CBI that he accepted money from M.K. and representatives on behalf of Azharuddin on a number of occasions and some of the transactions were to the tune of Rs. 10-15 Lakhs. This was also corroborated before CBI by Anil Steel that on two occasions he had made payments to Dr. Irani on behalf of M.K. CBI has also stated, "Dr. Irani has also confessed that he used to get around Rs. 25,000 - 50,000 on each occasion for rendering this service to Azharuddin. However, Azharuddin was silent about Dr. Ali Irani during his examination.

Back  Next

Mail Cricket Editor