'Course correction today would be good politics and also good economics,' notes T N Ninan.
Illustration: Uttam Ghosh/Rediff.com
The last couple of weeks have made three things clear.
First, the economy is slowing down.
Following the release of the lower-than-expected July-September growth number for gross domestic product, most analysts have lowered their full-year growth forecasts.
Some project second-half growth at under 7%.
The encouraging sign is a pick-up in investment, depressed so far, but that is overshadowed by flagging consumer spending.
The Reserve Bank recognises this, but continues to project full-year growth at 7.4%.
Even that implies a second-half growth rate of only 7.2% -- no better than the unsatisfactory trend rate from 2014.
Second, inflation has dipped more sharply than expected.
RBI targets 4% inflation.
The current rate has been below that for three months, and just 3.3% for the latest month (October).
Agricultural price inflation is lower still.
The quarterly GDP numbers record a sharp deterioration in terms of trade for agriculture.
This explains why farmers are in such distress in many states, even as depressed rural wages have contributed to poor rural demand.
And third, the full year's fiscal deficit target was crossed by October-end.
The government insists that it will stay within the full-year target of 3.3% of GDP (down from 3.5% in the last two years), but there is the growing possibility that it will be able to do so only by withholding payments that are due on various counts.
In other words, it will be a fudge.
The first two indicators (lower economic growth and below-target inflation) point to the need for an economic stimulus, especially when demand growth is slowing and there is spare capacity in the system.
Yet the policy response has been anything but.
The government continues to insist on sticking to fiscal contraction.
The RBI on its part argues that it needs more time to understand price trends, and therefore has not lowered its policy rate of 6.5%.
This, despite a more than 3 percentage point gap between that and the current inflation rate.
Both the government and RBI should re-examine their positions.
Loan rates in the market are simply too high.
HDFC's home loan rates range from 8.8% to 9.5% at a time when house prices are falling.
Naturally, housing demand is low.
Most banks have a lending rate of over 9% for their best customers.
Small and medium enterprises borrow at much higher rates of interest.
The effective borrowing rate for perhaps the majority of companies is more than their return on capital employed.
That translates to 'unaffordable'.
Interest rates need to drop if there is to be broad-based economic revival.
On its part, the fiscal stance should be less rigid.
The great danger in overspending by the government is that it lets loose inflation, which becomes difficult to tame.
That is not a serious danger today, when inflation is below target and the danger of runaway oil prices has passed.
There is therefore a legitimate case for arguing that the government should allow the deficit level to inch up to a more realistic 3.5% of GDP, the same level as in the last two years.
That will be a neutral, not expansionary, stance, easily justified in the current situation, and realistic since the deficit has already crossed the full year's 3.3% target in seven months.
Finally, there has to be a policy package to shore up agricultural prices, especially for crops with greater price volatility.
The target to double agricultural exports is a start, but more needs to be done -- and quickly.
It is only when farmers get a better price that agricultural wages go up, reducing rural poverty and boosting rural demand.
Politically, the Vajpayee government suppressed food prices and paid the price.
The first Manmohan Singh government corrected that, despite the cost of higher inflation, and won re-election.
So far, the Modi government has been repeating the Vajpayee mistake.
Course correction today would be good politics and also good economics.