Why will Mark Cavendish never win the Tour de France?
Because the Briton, arguably the best sprinter in the world, is not a good climber. Since 1913, the final standings of the Tour have been based on the overall time clocked by each rider, adding the time of each stage.
Time gaps in mountain stages are far bigger than in flat stages, giving climbers a huge advantage over sprinters. On the other hand, climbers, who are usually diminutive and light, often lose precious time in individual time trials, which favour powerful riders.
In the last few years, the event has been won by climbers -- Oscar Pereiro, Contador and Carlos Sastre -- yet most great Tour riders are all-rounders, winning both time trials and mountain stages.
Cavendish has improved in climbs in recent seasons and is the favourite to win the points standings green jersey he narrowly lost to Italy's Alessandro Petacchi last year and to Norway's Thor Hushovd in 2009.
Can a Briton win the Tour?
When Bradley Wiggins finished fourth in 2009, hopes rose that a Briton might at long last win the world's most famous cycling race. But the pursuit Olympic champion faltered badly in the next edition, finishing 24th as the leader of the wealthy Team Sky outfit assembled around him.
Wiggins's victory in the recent Criterium du Dauphine revived his chances and he himself admitted a podium placing was probably within reach. When launching Team Sky two seasons ago, team director Dave Brailsford said he hoped to place a Briton on the top spot within five years.
this
Users
Comment
article