NewsApp (Free)

Read news as it happens
Download NewsApp

Available on  

Rediff News  All News  » Sports » Brazil's football World Cup winners get bonus 50 years later!

Brazil's football World Cup winners get bonus 50 years later!

January 09, 2013 15:47 IST

Brazil's World Cup winning players from 1958, 1962 and 1970 have been awarded a bonus and a pension from the government in a controversial move that has split public opinion.

Brazil's sports ministry said the 54 players or their survivors will be given a one-off bonus of 100,000 reais and will also qualify for a monthly stipend of 3,916 reais.

The country's social security minister called the payments "an act of justice" that recognised the role Brazil's World Cup winners played in the country's development.

Some Brazilians believe those players put the country on the world map and also established Brazil as a soccer power.

The 1970 team in particular, thanks to the arrival of colour television and the brilliance of players such as Pele, Jairzinho, Rivelino and Tostao, captured the world's attention and is still considered one of the greatest teams of all time.

"I think that the Brazilian people recognise the debt we owe to these athletes," Sports Minister Aldo Rebelo said.

"It is worth stressing that football back then did not offer the salaries and sponsorship deals they do today. The athletes were almost like artisans and the country cannot conceive that these people who lifted the name of the country are going through tough times," Rebelo added.

Many players said the money would transform their lives. With the exception of Pele, very few live comfortably as their careers did not earn them the kind of riches enjoyed by today's big names.

"About 85 percent of the players live middle- to lower-class existences," said Marcelo Neves, the son of twice World Cup winner Gilmar and now president of an association of former players.

"This money could be the difference between life and death. Felix (the goalkeeper in the 1970 team), who died last year, couldn't get the medical

attention he deserved because he didn't have a very good health plan and the hospital he went to wasn't the best. If he had had money he might be alive today."


Neves stressed that some of the older players do not get a regular pension because soccer was not a recognised profession in the 1960s

and they were not able to make social security payments.


wasn't because they didn't want to," he said. "Most of them are over 65 years of age so this money will ensure the rest of their lives can be lived out in dignified circumstances."


not everyone agrees the veterans deserve a special pension half a century after their heroics, much less a fat bonus.


is a tremendous slap in the face to all those Brazilians who have worked their whole lives and don't get that amount of money," said Atila Nunes, a radio host who has criticised the award.

Nunes said if anyone should be assisting the old players it should be the Brazilian Football Confederation (CBF),

and not ordinary tax payers.


have asked why only winners get the pension when other players who trained and played just as hard did not. And why only soccer? What about champions in other sports?

One player has already rejected the money, saying even back in the 1950s and 60s

football players earned higher salaries than most workers.

"At the time we were well rewarded for the title," said Tostao, a striker in the 1970

team and now a respected columnist for the Folha de Sao Paulo newspaper.

"World Cup winners who are going through difficulties should be helped by the government, through Social Security, just like any other citizen, and by the existing government entities that help ex-athletes,"

he added. "The CBF and clubs also have an obligation to help ex-players who need assistance."

© Copyright 2015 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.