 | « Back to article | Print this article |
Read: PAC draft report that indicts Raja, criticises PMO
The Public Accounts Committee has, in a draft report on 2G scam, strongly indicted former Telecom minister A Raja and came down heavily on the Prime Minister's Office and the Cabinet Secretariat for not taking "corrective action" while not sparing even the prime minister for "some unfortunate omissions".
The report circulated by PAC Chairman Murli Manohar Joshi, which is most likely to be contested by members of the ruling United Progressive Alliance, is also understood to have attacked the then Finance minister P Chidambaram for recommending to the prime minister to "treat the matter as closed" instead of taking against those responsible for loss to the exchequer.
Click NEXT to read further...
Read the complete PAC draft report on 2G scam
Recommendations made by the PAC on 2G scam
'The PM kept his office at arm's length'
The report says the prime minister on January 3, 2008 wanting to keep the PMO at "arm's length" seemed to have given an "indirect green signal" to Raja to go ahead and "execute his unfair, arbitrary and dubious designs".
The controversial distribution of licences and spectrum was taken by the Dravida Munnettra Kazhagam representative in the Cabinet on January 10, 2008, which the CAG had estimated a presumptive revenue loss of over Rs 1.76 lakh crore.
Click NEXT to read further...
'Raja concealed his ulterior design'
The report, which will come up for consideration at tomorrow's meeting, said the PMO certainly either failed to see the "forebodings or was rendered a mute spectator". The committee said it was highly perturbed to note that the considered and imperative advise given by the prime minister and genuine concerns expressed by him on the developments in the telecom sector in his November 2007 letter to Raja was "just disregarded" by him.
"The prime minister was in fact misled when he was informed by Raja that the issue of auction of spectrum was considered but not recommended by the Telecom Commission and also not recommended by Telecom Regulatory Authority of India. The minister was telling half truth, concealing the other half, and concealing his ulterior design," the report said.
In its criticism of the PMO, the report said the PMO's reply that no suggestion of the law minister to set up an Empowered Group of Ministers was received by them does not convince the committee.
"The PMO was very much aware of law minister's suggestions but the counter view of the communication minister got overriding preference to the of law minister's view for some unknown reasons and thus no effort was made by the PMO to initiate the process of constitution of the EGoM.
"The PMO certainly either failed to see the forebodings or was rendered a mute spectator," the report said.
Click NEXT to read further...
All praises for Pranab Mukherjee
However, the report had a word of praise for the then External Affairs minister Pranab Mukherjee who had in a note to the PM revealed that he had underlined the responsibility of the government to frame, revise and change the policy in a transparent manner and then follow it in letter and spirit.
Mukherjee had also categorically remarked that while keeping on issuing new licences, the criteria for grant of the licences may be strengthened and put in public domain at the earliest.
Thus, it is evident that he did not give any wrong advice to Raja who in turn "distorted the facts while writing to the prime minister". Not only that, Raja "arrogantly" termed the suggestions of the law minister to refer the spectrum related matter to EGoM as "out of context".
Click NEXT to read further...
'Raja distorted the first-come, first-serve policy'
Raja audaciously informed the Prime Minister that the cut- off date has been fixed at September 25, 2007, on the plea of shortage of spectrum whereas on another occasion he had said that there was enough scope for allotment of spectrum to few new operators.
"His (Raja) assurance to the Prime Minister that he was not deviating from the established and existing procedures was a blatant lie as he deformed and distorted the first-come, first-serve policy," the draft report said.
In its comments on Chidambaram, the report said "the committee are shocked and dismayed to note that the finance minister, in his note dated February 15, 2008, acknowledged that spectrum is a scarce resource and the price of spectrum should be based on its scarcity value and efficiency of usage but made unique and condescending suggestion that the matter be treated as closed.
"The committee believed that ends of accountability demand that any wrongful loss caused to the government is made good and the guilty brought to justice.
"The committee view it most unfortunate that since the finance minister, the guardian of the public exchequer and entrusted with the principle task of mobilisation of resources for public welfare, instead of initiating stringent and swift action against all those responsible for the whopping loss to the exchequer, pleaded with the Prime Minister to treat the matter as closed," it said.
The committee found the secretary of Department of Economic Affairs deficient and wanting as he failed to bring the matter to the notice of cabinet secretary or even in writing to the finance minister even after irregularities became public and there was public outcry for the huge loss to the public exchequer.
It sought explanation from the then secretary, DEA and all those who chose to be silent bystander or rather indulgently condescending and pleaded for forgetting the loss and treating the chapter as closed.