India can never become a great power unless it assumes hard power status, says national security hawk Bharat Karnad

Bharat Karnad, one of India's leading national security hawks, believes that India right now doesn't deserve a permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council.
 
Karnad, research professor in National Security Studies at the Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi, bemoaned how humiliating it is to watch "every wretched visitor who comes to Delhi," being canvassed by the government to endorse India's bid for a permanent seat in the UNSC.
 
"India, as is, I am afraid doesn't deserve to be in the United Nations Security Council," he said during a panel discussion on Indian Views on Economics, International Institutions and Transnational Issues at a conference organised by George Washington University's Sigur Centre for Asian Studies and the Centre for a New American Security, titled India as a Global Power, Contending Views from India.
 
Karnad, who is the author of several books on strategy in South Asia, including Nuclear Weapons and Indian Security: The Realist Foundations of Strategy and India's Nuclear Policy, lectures regularly at various military and other forums.

"I don't see a UN Security Council seat, especially with a veto as an entitlement. Somehow, there is a belief in Delhi, that it is a right and I believe that has to be earned," he said.
 
Karnad argued that the permanent five members of the UN Security Council -- the United States, Russia, China, France and Britain -- are there "because they are great powers, not because they are individual countries."

Reportage: Aziz Haniffa

Click on NEXT for more...

Click on NEXT for more...

Karnad was also a part of the first National Security Advisory Board of the National Security Council of the government of India as a member of the Nuclear Doctrine Drafting Group and the external security and the technology security groups for the Strategic Review.

He continued, "We will get it when we exercise hard power and begin to take responsibility for the security of the region -- for the new order in the Indian Ocean and so on and so forth."
 
But former Indian ambassador to the US and ex-foreign secretary Lalit Mansingh shot back, "Why not India? Why do you have France, why do you have UK? Why not India?"
 
"In 1945, if it reflected the power structure of the world. Today, does the present permanent membership reflect the power structure? Is it acceptable that you have one country representing three continents -- Asia, Africa and Latin America," he said.
 
Mansingh argued, "So there is a need for a change and if you do change, India has a right to be there."
 
"The response we are getting is that it is so difficult to change the charter and it's going to take a long time. If it takes a long time, India's response is to hell with the UNSC, we are not interested," he said.

Click on NEXT for more...

Click on NEXT for more...