The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear a plea seeking direction to the Central Bureau of Investigation to lodge an FIR into the alleged conspiracy to "fix" Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi but said there was no urgency and the case would come up for hearing in the "due course".
The matter was mentioned for urgent listing before a bench comprising Justices S A Bobde and S A Nazeer by advocate M L Sharma, who has claimed in his petition that there was a conspiracy to malign the CJI in a "concocted, false sexual harassment" case.
Sharma urged the bench to list his plea for hearing on May 8.
"What is the urgency? You have filed it and it will come up for hearing," the bench said.
"It will be listed in due course," it added.
Sharma told the bench later that he was not seeking urgent listing of the matter.
He said his plea be listed for hearing before the same bench which has dealt with a matter in which a lawyer has filed an affidavit claiming larger conspiracy to frame the CJI.
"We do not know. It (petition) will be listed in due course. We will see when it will be listed and before whom," Justice Bobde told Sharma.
"However bona fide is your request, we cannot say that the matter be listed before a particular bench," the bench said.
Sharma has named activist lawyers like Prashant Bhushan, Shanti Bhushan, Kamini Jaiswal, Vrinda Grover, Indira Jaising, Nina Gupta Bhasin and Dushyant Dave as parties in his public interest litigation.
He has alleged that the actions of some of the lawyers amounted to "contempt of court" and there was a "planned conspiracy" to defame the CJI.
"The actions not only amount to contempt of court but there was also a planned conspiracy to defame the CJI and to control him and other judges of the Supreme Court. This is a serious fraud, forgery and false criminal attack upon the CJI and the institution," the plea said.
It also seeks a direction to CBI to register an FIR under various sections of the Indian Penal Code against these lawyers and the NGOs run by them, to arrest them and to investigate the case since 2010.
The apex court had on April 25 appointed former apex court judge Justice A K Patnaik to hold inquiry into the allegations of larger conspiracy to frame the CJI and fixing of benches in the top court.
However, the court had made it clear that inquiry by Justice (retd) Patnaik will not deal with the allegations of sexual harassment against the CJI, levelled by an ex-employee of the top court.
It had also said that outcome of the inquiry will not affect the in-house committee, which is dealing with the complaint against the CJI.
The court's order was passed while hearing advocate Utsav Singh Bains' affidavit in which the lawyer has claimed larger conspiracy to "fix" the CJI and fixing of benches in the apex court.
Bains had filed an affidavit following the unprecedented hearing on April 20 during which Justice Gogoi had said some "bigger force" was behind the sexual harassment allegations as they wanted to "deactivate" the CJI's office.
