Justice M R Shah recently rejected Bhatt's application in the 13-year-old case when he was the superintendent of police of Porbander district. Bhatt had sought quashing of the criminal complaint filed against him.
The court also vacated the stay, granted by it in December 2010, on conducting criminal proceedings against Bhatt in the case. The court has further directed the magistrate of the Porbander court to proceed further with the trial and conclude the same within 12 months.
All those concerned with the case have been directed by the court to cooperate with the trial court for early disposal of the case. "This court is of the opinion that this is not a fit case to exercise the powers under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to quash and set aside the impugned complaint and/or order passed by the learned magistrate directing to issue process against the applicant (Bhatt)," the HC stated in its order.
Bhatt, along with constable Vajubhai Chau, has been charged for the offence punishable under sections 330 (causing hurt to extort confession), 324 (causing hurt with dangerous weapon) read with section 34 (action done by several persons with common intent) of the Indian Penal Code on the complaint against them by one Naran Jadav in 1998 for causing him physical and mental torture in police custody for extracting confession in a Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act and Arms Act case.
