rediff.com

NewsApp (Free)

Read news as it happens
Download NewsApp

Available on  

Rediff News  All News 
Rediff.com  » News » No proof that Syria used chemical weapons in Idlib: Putin

No proof that Syria used chemical weapons in Idlib: Putin

Last updated on: April 12, 2017 15:07 IST

Condemning the missile attack by the Unites States on a Syrian airbase, Russian President Vladimir Putin has stated that it was clear evidence of international law violation by Washington, DC.

Speaking on the issue in an interview with Mir 24 TV channel, the Russian President said there is no proof that the Syrian government used chemical weapons in Idlib, however, there is startling evidence that US flouted international laws, reports Sputnik.

"Where is evidence that the Syrian troops used chemical weapons? No evidence. And what about violation of the international law? It is an obvious fact. What was the reaction of the NATO allies? All of them are nodding like bobble heads," Putin said.

Earlier, US Defence Secretary James Mattis stressed that he personally reviewed the intelligence on the chemical attack in Syria's Idlib province and the Syrian government was guilty of the crime, however, he did not come forth with evidence to back his claim.

Mattis said that Syria will pay a ‘very, very stiff price’ if it used chemical weapons again and asserted that America’s top priority in Syria remained fighting the Islamic State.

Spicer apologises for Hitler 'didn't use chemical arms' claim

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer has apologised for his ‘insensitive’ remarks during a press briefing when he said Adolf Hitler, who gassed millions during the Holocaust, did not use chemical weapons against his own people.

Spicer’s apology came on national television on Tuesday for comparing the Nazi leader with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, who has been accused of using nerve agent against Syrians.

“I mistakenly used an inappropriate and insensitive reference to the Holocaust for which, frankly, there is no comparison,” Spicer told CNN hours after he made the remarks.

“I was obviously trying to make a point about the heinous acts that Assad made against his own people last week using chemical weapons and gas,” he said in an effort to control the damage done by his remarks, which drew strong reactions from political leaders, the Jew community and human rights bodies.

Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi demanded Spicer be fired.

“Sean Spicer must be fired, and the president must immediately disavow his spokesman’s statements. Either he is speaking for the President, or the president should have known better than to hire him,” Pelosi said.

House Democratic Whip Steny H Hoyer said Spice's remarks were ‘indicative of the extraordinary lack of knowledge, perspective, and sensitivity that the Trump administration has brought to Washington’.

Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky said: “It is clear that this administration needs a history lesson and a staff shake-up.”

Nita M Lowey, ranking member of the House Appropriations Committee, said it was disturbing that US President Donald Trump’s chief spokesman has ‘either a cavalier aversion to facts, is completely unmoored from reality, or both’.

Spicer had on tuesday during his regular press briefing attempted to shame Russia and Assad by comparing the Syrian leader with Hitler. He had said: “We didn’t use chemical weapons in World War II. You had someone as despicable as Hitler who didn’t even sink to using chemical weapons.”

“So you have to, if you’re Russia, ask yourself is this a country that you and a regime that you want to align yourself with?”

Later, in a statement to White House reporters, Spicer said in no way he was trying to lessen the horrendous nature of the Holocaust.

“Any attack on innocent people is reprehensible and inexcusable,” he said.

“If they use chemical weapons, they are going to pay a very, very stiff price,” Mattis told reporters during his first Pentagon briefing as defence chief.

Notwithstanding the Russian allegations that the US is selling a false narrative over the use of chemical weapons by the authoritarian Syrian regime, Mattis defended the American missile attacks against Syria last week.

“Last Tuesday on the 4th of April, the Syrian regime attacked its own people using chemical weapons. I have personally reviewed the intelligence, and there is no doubt the Syrian regime is responsible for the decision to attack and for the attack itself,” he said.

“In response to the attack, our government began a deliberate process, led by the National Security Council, to recommend diplomatic and military options to the president. We met over several days and I spoke with some of our allies,” he added.

Mattis said the National Security Council considered the near-century-old international prohibition against the use of chemical weapons, the Syrian regime’s repeated violations of that international law, and the inexplicably ruthless murders the regime had committed.

“We determined that a measured military response could best deter the regime from doing this again. As always, we examined how best to avoid civilian casualties in the execution of the strike, and our actions were successful,” Mattis said.

“Based on these considerations, on April 6, the president directed military action consistent with our vital national interests to deter the use of chemical weapons,” he said.

This military action demonstrates that the US will not passively stand by while Assad blithely ignores international law and employs chemical weapons he had declared destroyed, he added.

“We were aware of the presence of Russians at the airfield and took appropriate actions to ensure no Russians were injured in the attack,” he said.

Mattis said the US military policy in Syria has not changed.

“Our priority remains the defeat of ISIS. ISIS represents a clear and present danger, an immediate threat to Europe and ultimately, a threat to the US homeland," he said.

Appearing along with Mattis, the US Central Command Commander Gen Joseph Votel said the US targeted 59 locations on the airfield and struck 57 of those.

“We assessed that we achieved our stated objective and the regime’s ability to generate offensive military capability from Shayrat airfield, which we assess, was the launching point for this chemical attack has been severely degraded,” he said.

“We are obviously paying close attention in the environment in the wake of these strikes and remain appropriately postured to respond as necessarily. Meanwhile, we are focused on the Defeat ISIS campaign, which remains our primary mission,” Votel said.

Responding to a question, Mattis said the goal right now in Syria, and the military campaign is focused breaking the IS and destroying the IS in Syria.

“This was a separate issue that arose in the midst of that campaign. The use by the Assad regime of chemical weapons, and we addressed that militarily. But the rest of the campaign stays on track, exactly as it was before Assad’s violation," he said.

Mattis alleged that Assad has used chemical weapons several times over the last several years, violated the international law that has prohibited their use since 1925.

“Syria is a signatory to that international convention. For them to have done this several times recently over the last several years is what I mean by recently, you’ve got to ask him why he chose now to try it again,” he said.

“I trust he regrets it now considering the damage done to his air force but when I say he should think long and hard about it, I’ll just let the mission speak for itself on that score,” the defence secretary said.

Mattis said he does not know if the Russians knew about the chemical attack in advance.

“It was very clear that the Assad regime planned it, orchestrated it, and executed it. And beyond that, we can’t say right now. We don’t know anything beyond that,” he said.

With inputs from ANI.

IMAGE: A man carries the body of a child after the suspected gas attack in Idlib, Syria. Photograph: Ammar Abdullah/Reuters

© Copyright 2018 PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent.