Your Views:What is U.N doing? This is becoming something of a Joke, A Body formed to protect the people of the world is unmoved by America's Agreession. What I fail to understand is that America can develop Chemical & Biological Weapons and so are Long Range Missiles but Iraq or any other Country cannot develop anything beyond 300 Kms, Let the Security Council first Check U.S & U.k's Arsenal of weapons of Mass Destruction and then proceed further. It is surprising and very very sad to know that no country is able to lend Military Support to Irag during this time of Crisis. If France, Russia, China, India & Germany only Threaten U.S with a Support for Iraq Militarily, U.S will fall on it;s feet. Imagine so many Innocent lives are going to be destroyed and this will only create More Osamas leading many many more sept 11 for America & It's Allies. Time for People of this world to Awake & Arise elsewise History will never forgive us all. With Deepest Sympaties & Prayers to the Iraqi People.
Thu Mar 20 15:50:51 2003
Your Views:In fact both the parties need to be harnessed by the world community especially by the so called global custodian the United Nations. Saddam for its undemocratic and hegmonoius control on the people of Iraq and US for being self proclaimed global police, an hypocrite of the top level. both the coutries should be banned from global society but who would challenge Mighty US
Thu Mar 20 15:51:16 2003
Your Views:Must Go. All Saddams worldover must go. All the terrorists are Saddams and they all must go to the grave yards.
Thu Mar 20 15:51:20 2003
Name:Capt. Poornapragna G A
Your Views:Whether Saddam should go or not has to be decided by Iraqis and not yankees. they have no business to interfere in Iraqi affairs. Afterall UN was doing a good job with their inspectors trying to unearth the truth. Is US afraid of facing the truth that there are no WMD in Iraq. To save their faces is Bush and his partner in crime Blair resoting to bombing of Iraq. No doubt saddam should be tried for waht he has done all these years to Kurds, Kuwait and internally to his detractors. But there is a method in dealing with him. If Balir can protect a criminal like Pinochet of Chile why not give time to Un to sort out Iraq. It is doublespeak and unilateralism of the highest order. We should support farnce and germany and rest of the europe in charting out the new world order and not to bow to the dictates of Us and its clones.
Thu Mar 20 15:51:25 2003
Your Views:no saddam ahouldn`t go.the bush administration is just trying to show the world that they are the boss.
Thu Mar 20 15:51:30 2003
Your Views:I Salute Saddam. He is the real Hero and Bush is the real threat to human civilisation. He is the one who should go.
Thu Mar 20 15:51:32 2003
Your Views:I do not like the actions of US at all. I thinks that's the only powerfull country and has used Iraq to show that. Shame on US.
Thu Mar 20 15:51:35 2003
Your Views:Dear Rediff Oil for Bush is indeed thicker than blood. If Bush was serious about Islamic terrorism he will plan to occupy Saudi Arabia, Iran and Pakistan who have far more credible claims to terrorism.
Thu Mar 20 15:51:46 2003
Your Views:I feel any war against any contry must get the UN approval with out which it is volitation of UN charter
Thu Mar 20 15:52:04 2003
Name:Siddharth R Mehta
Your Views:Apparently the msot powerful nation has made the UN redundant. Simply speaking it means I have the power I will dictate terms. This is dictatorship under the guise of democracy. If President Bush had respected the views of UN he would risen in the eyes of others in the world . By offering aid to those who support him it simply amounts to buying the poor nations in supporting them. Where are the values and ethics and morals of leaders? I am afraid this is not good for the world community especially the disrespect shown by US towards UN.
Thu Mar 20 15:52:27 2003
Your Views:No. Niether the Yanks nor George Bushes are the arbiters of Iraqi future. That is the exclusive prerogative of the iraqi masses. Ofcourse what Bush and Blair have done is that they have made assasinations a state policy. If all countries adopt a similar stand, then the fate of both Blair and Bush is not likely to be very different. God have mercy on this planet.
Thu Mar 20 15:52:29 2003
Your Views:Democracy shld be restored. who the hell is US to do it. they just want to rule the world & test their new equipments
Thu Mar 20 15:52:46 2003
Your Views:Really saddam is a true warrior.It is because he is the only man to reciprocate against the dictatorship of americans who have british slaves with them.What has america to do with iraq's social cause.America has proved that UN laws are only for countries which need US help in rebuilding themselves.This agitation against iraq will cost the US dearly as it happened with the twin towers.I think US are terrorist who preaches anti terrorism in open and ridicules other countries.Americans should think that having sophisticated missiles alone will not make them win the war,the real thing they will be missing is a birbal like saddam.By attacking iraq ,america wants to make iraq a colony for them so that they can control other rebel countries as well as swim inthe oilpool of iraq. I think the Mr.Koffi annan should sit with its partners and declare US and UK as temporary members of UN security council,because they ignores the norms of UN frequently. I suggest that saddam should be there till his death in iraq because he is the only person to take on US aand its slaves.US-pakistan with britain has slaves will make a interesting combination of world reckon terrorists.
Thu Mar 20 15:52:58 2003
Your Views:May be the day has come when the United States has become too powerful to contain. Even the normal American reaction is apathy. How does one justify a war that clearly has no just cause? I dont think the Americans are going to stop with just Iraq. If the States wants to run the nations by men of its own choice - mark my words - its really mistaken. History is witness to the fact that all the superpowers have fallen when they thought they were invincible. Democracy in the international order is something the "Land of the Free"" got to respect more.
Thu Mar 20 15:53:00 2003
Your Views:Saddam must go but not like the way shown by US. The Irakies has to send him away and not Mr. bush. Bush cannot interfear in other countries internal issues.
Thu Mar 20 15:53:01 2003
Your Views:NO! NO! NO!
Thu Mar 20 15:53:02 2003
Your Views:Personal Interest. It's not a war for global welfare.It's 100% personal interest.Well, US,UK & AU will share their piece of oil cake once they demolish Saddam rule.The whole world knows about this.More than oil its Mr.Bush's personal interest to revenge Sadham as his father could'nt do it.It is not a war for people, it's absolutely personal ineterest.But the pity is, UK and AU join US as allies. But they do want their piece of oil cake. Just for oil and personal revenge, Bush is killing thousands/millions of innocent people. It's not only Iraq people, its also US and its allies war soldiers and people residing in neighouring countries. This proves that any kind of growing Super power should be killed in the initial stage, now US has grown too much. It's so funny about US. It's not just Mr.Bush, it's also few more nuts in US, if they have nothing to do, they would probably would take a good gun, enter school campus and kill innocent students.There is no justification and i really wonder why countries around the world maintain silence.Let's hope US does'nt attack China or India saying it attacked these countries out of global interest just bcos to reduce their growing population.
Thu Mar 20 15:53:03 2003
Your Views:u.s doing for his personnal think and the entire world should oppose u.s
Thu Mar 20 15:53:04 2003
Your Views:bush and saddam, calling each other madman, fighting the war for justice and seeing the other as the greatest threat to humanity! while one appears as enfant terrible the other is a trumped up ageing general, smarter and less stupid. i do not believe that saddam hussein should be removed as iraqi president anymore than pervez musharraf or the despotic heads of various arab countries. prez bush is not trying to remove saddam from the top of iraqi govt but from the top of billions of gallons of oil. the war would not only destabilize the middle east but put into quandry the many manhy arabs who actually believe in democracy across teh region and elsewhere. bush's action would label the liberals as anti-islamic and american stooges. sad indeed. but worse is that dubya again proves to you that we havent really come out of the ancient and medival times when might was right and nothing like sanctity for national sovereignty or even will of the people existed. as far as i can make out, iraqi pepole were living happily with little comaplaints against their president until he made the kuwaitit blunder.even today they would do merrily do the same, if a certain bush gave them a chance
Thu Mar 20 15:53:07 2003
Your Views:He should not leave the country. All other countries should put a nuclear bomb in New York City
Thu Mar 20 15:53:15 2003
Your Views:disband UN & allied agencies unless countries agree tht we also hv the same right to attack pakistan & disarm them as usa & its allies hv to disarm iraq. if a stranger enters a us citizens home & feels threatened he has a right to kill the intruder by any means & his action is justified by law. same way us & allies hv entrd iraq & bombing them & in same way the iraqis have a right to defend themselves with anything they posses incldng nuclear,chemical & biological. these weapons have always been called as deterrents & iraqis wl be in their full right to use them for their defence
Thu Mar 20 15:53:21 2003
Your Views:Why he should go away from his country...he did so many thing for Iraq and specially the people of Iraq wants him love him and say that they are free just bcoz of great Saddam hussien even the latest Election shows the result and slapped the USA and Bush with 99.97% voting result in favour of Iraq's Hero The Great Saddam. And second thing who the Hell America is to think about whole Earth...why they just mind their own bussiness...humm..They just want OIL for free as all UAE and Gulf country licking the USA and giving all their preicious oil for free and only the Saddam is dare to stand AGAINST HIM...As a conclusion I would like to say that Saddam is on right Path he should not go away from IRAQ but that stupid USA BUSh should hide himself in some BUSH...
Thu Mar 20 15:53:27 2003
Your Views:This is really happy news for the India.Conservative mentality person not only Saddam but also all the muslim head must go out.
Thu Mar 20 15:53:34 2003
Your Views:US is bound to pay a heavy price someday for its foreign policy. It is very obvious what the US is after. There are so many nations where there is starvation and death. US seems to look the other way to these thirld world countries. So the less said the better about US and is policies. Now its just a matter of time before it finds it being marauded by the likes of North Korea with a Nuke. It has to be remembered that evry dog has its DAY. so lets wait for the D Day.
Thu Mar 20 15:53:38 2003
Thu Mar 20 15:53:40 2003
Your Views:US has behaved like "pottais" (a Tamil word) which means men without balls. They first get the United Nations Inspectors to get rid of the firepowers of Iraq and then when the going is seemingly safe for them they get into attack. They now resemble the typical Beach bully kicking sand into a weaker man's eyes. The United States of Eisenhower and Kennedy was not like that. It took a Clinton to make Bush respectable and it now takes a Bush to make Saddam Hussein respectable. The Bush administration is resembling the typical Stalinist era, with the free press being allowed to function freely only as long as they support the Bush policies. They conjure phrases such as the "coalition of the willing" except that they do not specify what they are willing about. Iranian Oil? How many of these coalition partners are not dependent on American doles? It is not as if the US policy makers are not aware of their weak case. It is just that they are following Machiaevellian logic for empire gains in a cycnical and brutal manner. Us has made 1) UN redundant; 2 and 3)More than Weapons of Mass Destruction, Oil is thicker than blood 3) Democracy cannot be imposed. 4)Saddam and Bush should go.
Thu Mar 20 15:53:41 2003
Your Views:It is not my view or your view, Esteemed Sirs, that is important whether Saddam Should Go............It is the views of Iraqis !!!!
Thu Mar 20 15:53:41 2003
Your Views:No as a matter of fact all the people watching America play a washout games should have their presidents and prime ministers resigned
Thu Mar 20 15:53:42 2003
Name:Abhilasha Das Aikat
Your Views:The world today is under threat not from weapons of mass destruction but from the hegemony of the US.By undermining the authority of UN, US and its allies have shown scant regard for international opinion! President Bush, we in India not only believe but have concrete proof of Pakistan's involvement in terrorism against us.Going by your logic we have to attack them , right? And serve Gen Musarraf an ultimatum to leave Pakistan in 48 hours! But alas President Bush! Hypocricy is thy other name and Gen Musarraf is thy loyal servant!!!!
Thu Mar 20 15:53:45 2003
Your Views:This war is only to keep the world under control and to establish the iraqui govt. which supports the America for their oil capturing mission.
Thu Mar 20 15:53:47 2003
Thu Mar 20 15:53:53 2003 Thu Mar 20 15:54:00 2003
Name:K G Shankar
Your Views:Saddam must go at least in the interest of the nation
Thu Mar 20 15:54:05 2003
Your Views:saddam should not quit
Thu Mar 20 15:54:05 2003
Your Views:I,do not think Saddam Husein should leave Iraq just because America thinks that way.If at all he goes that can be only to his peoples uprising and not because bushs dadagiri.
Thu Mar 20 15:54:08 2003
Your Views:The way President Bush has defied UN council and went ahead with then war shows that countries at UN council is just puppet in front of US. They cannot do anything. Mr.Bush is No one to ask Saddam Hussain and his son's to leave their Mother land. It is the citizens of Iraq who should decide his fate. If any one person has to be branded terrorist. It has to be President George Bush of USA. The whole world should wake up now and stop US from its Evil idea of concuring the whole world. This man can just blame any one person and than bomb the whole country, killing thousands of civilion. Yesterday it was Afganisthan, today Iraq, tomorrow may be Koria or India. Each nation opposing war on Iraq should unite and stop US from bombing and killing innocent people of Iraq. The countires opposing war should help Iraq fighting against USA ( coalition ) force. Mr.Bush's only intention is to control oil field of Iraq. His claim about Iraq having nuclear weopen which can kill innocent people of USA is just a gimmick. Mr. Bush should be branded terrorist number one above Osama bin Laden.
Thu Mar 20 15:54:15 2003
Your Views:Saddam Should stay.
Thu Mar 20 15:54:17 2003
Your Views:this is real bad that mr. bush has gone against will of most of the world population and imposed a war on iraq.he call n. korea axis of evil and it is well known that pakistan has given them that technology which is their main ally in so called war against terrorism.if bush hag guts enogh he should attack n. korea.
Thu Mar 20 15:54:20 2003
Your Views:The people of iraq have the authority to decide. Who is the US to intervene and that also without the approval of the US. The US says Iraq has possible nuclear weapons, doesnt the US have them, and should the world then unite and ask the US to disarm ? My concern is for the poor suffering of the Iraqi people, they have been suffering for the past 11 years. Something has to be done to stop the US from this aggression. Lets stand together for world peace.
Thu Mar 20 15:54:37 2003
Your Views:Saddam should be remain in office and should not go
Thu Mar 20 15:54:40 2003
Your Views:Why Saddam should go? There is no need for him to step down. My feeling is that Bush should be killed And America should lose in WAR and they should get lesson for their future.
Thu Mar 20 15:54:52 2003
Your Views:Bush is a problem...not Saddam! Saddam is only doing something to save himself..fight for his & his coutryz rights!!!
Thu Mar 20 15:55:01 2003
Your Views:Here the question is, what Mr. Bush is doing justice to US people and the whole world? My definite answer is NO. World politics cannot be powered and controlled by whims and wishes of a fanatic leaders. It seems Mr. Bush is trying to complete the job of his father, which he was not able complete 10 years back. Govt. in US have changed, there was 9/11 attack, so many things happened in last 10 years. Who gives the right to US President to take control over the Iraq and ask Mr. Hussain to leave the contry? If India tries to take similar action against Pakistan, will Mr. Bush keep mum about the whole thing and support India? If Iraq pulls neighbouring contries in the war, what would US and UN would do in that case? It's injustice towards humanity. UN and all other contries who are not in favour of war, should protest against and they can go to an extent of putting sanctions against US. Is there any brave leader in the world, who would go for this? Sadly, it's not going to happen and US is continuing with there actions against Iraq. Tomorrow, it could be Pakistan or China, may be any other contry which is going against US. Stop this violance at Global level and live peacefully.
Thu Mar 20 15:55:07 2003
Your Views:I dont think saddam shld go...it doesnt make sense that if he goes. .US will no wau stop its nonsense stuff.. this war is just for money game.. the world has witness this many times..
Thu Mar 20 15:55:10 2003
Your Views:this is unjustified demand
Thu Mar 20 15:55:13 2003
Your Views:No Saddam should not go. If Iraqi people want them why should other country has to decide for him. USA or UK has no right to decide and they should not interfier in other country. USA & UK have declared so many time that they will fight against terrorism but they are blessing to Pakistan in short they are looking their personal interest first and then every thing. This is totally selfishness for which they are well known.
Thu Mar 20 15:55:23 2003
Your Views:Sir Should Saddam go? It's better we human race get rid off George Walker Bush.he's becoming greatest threat to humanity than any body else.Those who are supporting These wanton killings are Spineless, hungry Vultures.
Thu Mar 20 15:55:40 2003
Your Views:Well. Who should be in power in Iraq should be decided by Iraq people and not by the US President. My feeling is that US has started this for its own selfish motives. Today its Iraq. God knows who is tommorow. So its time the World Nations have to come together and Stop US from such atrocities. Pray to GOD to make US face another Vietnam in Iraq.
Thu Mar 20 15:55:49 2003
Your Views:why? Mr Saddam has to go. why not Bush. tell me the difference between the Hitler of 20th centry and Mr bush. For me both are same chracters. All the world which is supporting the U.S or seeing the war from distance is as much as to be blammed as bush. how much you will give to appease this vampire? I am wondering about his next target may be N.korea or Iran and if things goes like this we are also endanger species in the years to come. As the things are going this centry will be called as the century of Anti-America. May God give this bush a little wisdom and knowlege to use the power for benefit of humans.
Thu Mar 20 15:55:52 2003
Your Views:no, bush must go
Thu Mar 20 15:56:02 2003
Your Views:Before this,this man was so furious for the entire world. Again after imposing so many compulsons and prohibitions,he is not accepted by this world.He is not casual for his public.The common man related to him and his nation is not happy.He has prepared the weapons of mass distruction.For whom?Other country has not even thought.His neighbours are afraid of him and can not slip.Only country like U.S. can bundle him out. No other can even think of.Blood is only for life.To produce energy oil is required and not the blood.If democracy does not establish its on way,then the force must be used as the final weapon.The world has taken so many years to topple this only man.Even he is not superior like U.S.If he is left unseen and not been wiped out,the whole world will have to face and experience for the full century. He must go. Anybody like him must be thrown out.With collective effort,all must run this earth nicely and piecefully.
Thu Mar 20 15:56:16 2003
Your Views:Whatever Bush is doing is wrong.
Thu Mar 20 15:56:16 2003
Your Views:What makes a war happen? Backstage of the American attack against Iraq in 1991 The expenses for the Gulf war 40 billion US dollars But who paid for this? Instinctively we say that the $ 40 billion, was paid by the USA Where did they find this money? The oil price before the war was approx. 15$ per barrel... Where did they find this money? Net profit from the increase in the price of oil: 60 billion $ Who owns the oil companies? Let's make some calculations... But this is not over yet... Finally, who paid the '91 war against Iraq? But this is not over yet... So, the USA, have made a total profit of... But this is not over yet... 2. Where did the $ 40 billion spent for the war go? Last thoughts Now it is easy to assume that the Gulf war in 1991, happened for financial reasons only, and not for some "humanitarian reason" or for the "right to freedom". Last thoughts The war in Afghanistan had as a main target the installation of a pawn government that would agree with the construction of a pipe line (American owned), of 2.500 km length that would run across its territory.
Thu Mar 20 15:56:30 2003
Your Views:No need. This is only the instict of USA & its allies to show their domination over the world. This will lead to a war between the two major religions.
Thu Mar 20 15:56:40 2003
Your Views:It is time for Saddam to go. Though US is not absolutely correct in their action, someone has to bell this cat which is neither doing good for the Citizens of Iraq for the world in general. Such a Dictator should go rather than continuously doing harm for a good country with well educated citizens in every sphere of life. When he is not going on his own, we have no other alternative but to support Bush in his action. If not now, the Iraqis can never get a chance to live peacefully. After Sad Damn, his sons will come and follow the foot-steps of their father. The bitter pill has to be swallowed, which justifies the action of US.
Thu Mar 20 15:56:48 2003
Your Views:Stop harassing saddam hussein.let him & his people live in peace. united states stop bullying the rest of the world.
Thu Mar 20 15:56:54 2003
Your Views:Hi I dont understand why he should go from his post since all his country people supports him and more over how bush can decide who should be in which post.Who knows after some times he says vajpay should change from PM post and give to some body else?Is he the U S president or world president
Thu Mar 20 15:57:02 2003
Your Views:SHAME ! SHAME ! on US .
Thu Mar 20 15:57:06 2003
Your Views:Theres no doubt that its an unjust War. U.S.A has always had uliterior motive in all their actions and one can't expect any better behaviour from the likes of U.K. But, whats very disturbing and surprising (or is it not so surprising!!) is the silence of Mr. Putin. Is he really a World Leader as is portrayed to be? I have my doubts. As for our leaders, they are nothing but a bunch of Eunuchs, who are neither here nor there. GOD sees the truth....but waits. My dear Americans & Enghlishmen, wait till you hear from the ALMIGHTY, and when he hits you, none of your Patriots or other gizmos will stand a chance. Amen.
Thu Mar 20 15:57:16 2003
Your Views:U.N. has to decide this , not usa or u.k. so it is really going to be bad time for usa and u.k. in future by pro- islamic group.....
Thu Mar 20 15:57:27 2003
Your Views:Its not war for just Weapons of Mass Destruction but for crude oil ,and complete the work that not completed by senior bush(killing of sadam)
Thu Mar 20 15:57:47 2003
Your Views:Here the question is not whether Saddam should go or not, but to me the question is who has given the right to the US to be the global protector. Mr. Bush has even defied the UN in this case. And I tell you, he may be able to smoke out Saddam out of Iraq but this war will give rise to many more Saddams and the Us will be in constant threat. Doesnt this war show the most fearful dog attack the other first thinking that if struck down I will be saved???
Thu Mar 20 15:57:51 2003
Your Views:Yes, Saddam should go ! Its high time the people of Iraq are suffering under his tyranny. He is cruel dictator who doesn't hesitate to use chemical weapons against his own citizens. At the same time, he poses a serious threat to Israel & Western countries. Let there be democracy in Iraq & people live in peace & prosperity.
Thu Mar 20 15:57:52 2003
Your Views:i think saddam has right to deffend him self. what ever done us is nothing but weapons destruction in the name of war. i think both sr.bush and jr.bush banned from the earth and as weel as from universe. attack on iraq was unjustice and not fair.
Thu Mar 20 15:58:07 2003
Your Views:Bush Administration has made the biggest mistake by attacking Iraq.He did not care to think about the plight of the innocent children.
Thu Mar 20 15:58:14 2003
Your Views:NO !
Thu Mar 20 15:58:19 2003
Your Views:america has no right to dictate who should rule in a country especially when the ruler of that country is co-operating
Thu Mar 20 15:58:46 2003
Thu Mar 20 15:58:52 2003
Thu Mar 20 15:59:00 2003
Thu Mar 20 15:59:00 2003
Thu Mar 20 15:59:05 2003
Thu Mar 20 15:59:13 2003
Thu Mar 20 15:59:31 2003
Thu Mar 20 15:59:44 2003
Thu Mar 20 15:59:52 2003
Thu Mar 20 15:59:53 2003
Your Views:In my opinion saddam should not quit but fight bravely with bush and get sucess Iwish him for the best
Thu Mar 20 16:00:18 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:00:20 2003
Your Views:Though Saddam is notorious and did malign act in 1991
Thu Mar 20 16:00:22 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:00:23 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:00:25 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:00:33 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:00:44 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:00:58 2003
Your Views:I feel Bush should go & not Saddam
Thu Mar 20 16:00:59 2003
Your Views:No way, Bush is only trying to fulfil his fathers agenda -US
Thu Mar 20 16:01:09 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:01:10 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:01:11 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:01:18 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:01:19 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:01:50 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:01:58 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:02:12 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:02:14 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:02:15 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:02:23 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:02:37 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:02:51 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:02:53 2003
Name:Nilay Rajnikant Wankawala
Thu Mar 20 16:03:07 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:03:36 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:04:00 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:04:13 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:04:47 2003
Your Views:In the larger interests of his nation and the people Saddam Hussein should step down
Thu Mar 20 16:04:53 2003
Your Views:Its not et all good to go ahead w/o UN's nod (Then Y is the UN there, UN is not required any more, when it cannot stop US and its allies).And
Thu Mar 20 16:04:59 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:05:02 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:05:02 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:05:09 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:05:19 2003
Your Views:What the hell this reckless, dubious Dubya thinks of himself-
Thu Mar 20 16:05:29 2003
Name:KS Kiran Kumar
Thu Mar 20 16:05:38 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:05:48 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:06:17 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:06:26 2003
Your Views:I do not want to elaborate on whether Saddam is a dictator or not. Whether Saddam should go or not should be decided by Iraqis themsleves and not by a stubborn "son of a b#@&h" sitting in a country called USA in a totally different continent 2 oceans apart. Not so long ago, Iraqis themselves voted in favor of Saddam remaining as President of Iraq. The "referendum" may have been rigged, but all said and done it is still a verdict. So none of us have the right to decide whether Saddam should leave Iraq or not. Iraqis shall decide.
Thu Mar 20 16:06:31 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:06:42 2003
Thu Mar 20 16:06:58 2003
Name:KS Kiran Kumar
Thu Mar 20 16:06:58 2003
Name:KS Kiran Kumar
Thu Mar 20 16:07:00 2003