The document, filed with the military commission at the US naval base, uses the Arabic term for a consultative assembly in describing the five men as the "9/11 Shura Council," and says their actions were an offering to God, the New York Times reported.
The detainess also expressed pride for their action. The document is titled The Islamic Response to the Government's Nine Accusations, the military judge at the Guantanamo Bay detention camp said in a separate filing, obtained by the Times. The document was filed on behalf of the five men, including Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, who has described himself as the mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks, the paper said.
President Obama halted the military proceedings at Guantanamo in the first days after his inauguration, and the five men's case is on hiatus until the government decides how it will proceed, the Times added. Several of the men, the paper reported, have earlier said in military commission proceedings at Guantnamo that they planned the 2001 attacks and that they sought martyrdom.
The strategic goal of the five men in making the new filing, which reached the military court on March 5, was not clear, the Times
reported. In their filing, the men describe the planning of the Sept 11 attacks and the killing of Americans as a model of Islamic action, and say the American government's accusations cause them no shame, the paper reported quoting the excerpts read by a government official to a reporter.
"To us," the official continued reading, they are not accusations. To us they are a badge of honor, which we carry with honour." It appears that the men wrote the document at meetings they are permitted to conduct periodically at the detention camp without lawyers, the Times said.
In his brief court order describing the filing, the military judge who has been handling the case, Colonel Stephen Henley of the Army, said the men sought no specific legal action. Judge Henley ordered that the filing be released immediately, but officials said objections from lawyers for two of the men had held up release Monday.
All five of the men have said they want to represent themselves, but in the case of these two men, Ramzi bin al-Shibh and Mustafa Ahmed al-Hawsawi, the military judge had not yet determined their competency when the proceedings were halted.