rediff.com

NewsApp (Free)

Read news as it happens
Download NewsApp

Available on  

Rediff News  All News 
Rediff.com  » News » Activists urge Amitav Ghosh to decline Dan David Prize

Activists urge Amitav Ghosh to decline Dan David Prize

Last updated on: April 21, 2010 15:17 IST

A host of pro-Palestine activists has urged eminent writer Amitav Ghosh not to accept the Tel Aviv-based Dan David Prize.

Many organisations, particularly, the British Committee for the Universities of Palestine (BRICUP) and Pakistanis for Palestine, have urged the writer to decline the award, saying accepting the award is tantamount to acknowledging Israel's colonialist regime.

Top Canadian novelist and activist Margaret Atwood, too, has been honoured with the same award.

Activists have started online campaigns, appealing both the personalities to skip the award.

On his part, Ghosh, who withdrew his illustrious work Glass Palace from the Commonwealth Writers' Prize in 2001, says Dan David Prize is awarded by a university in conjunction with a private foundation.

It is not awarded by the state of Israel, asserts the writer in a letter adderssed to protestors.

.......................................................................................................................................................................................

Here we reproduce Ghosh's letter:

Thank you for your message. I have received many others in relation to the Dan David Prize, which I am sharing with Margaret Atwood.

To begin with: I think it is of paramount importance to note that this prize is awarded by a university in conjunction with a private foundation: it is not awarded by the state of Israel.

I would like to state clearly that I do not believe in embargoes and boycotts where they concern matters of culture and learning. On the contrary I believe very strongly that it is important to defend the notion that institutions of culture and learning must, in principle, be regarded as autonomous of the state. Or else every writer in America and Britain, and everyone who teaches in a British or American university, would necessarily be implicated in the Iraq war, and by extension, in Israel's actions in Gaza and Palestine. Similarly every Indian writer and academic would also be complicit in the actions of the Indian government in areas of conflict. And if we don't defend this principle how will we defend the rights of dissent of those who are employed in universities  especially, for instance, in times of war, when reasons of state can be cited to create an explicit complicity?

Against the advice of some activists, I went to Burma/Myanmar in 1996/7 when I was researching my book The Glass Palace. I am convinced that by going there, and writing the book I did something that was, in some small way, useful; staying away would have achieved nothing. I traveled to Sri Lanka in 2001, to deliver a lecture during one of the worst periods of the conflict; I have been guest of honour at a book fair in a Gulf country where millions of my compatriots live and work in conditions of helotry, without any civil rights and religious freedoms. Many areas of my own country, India, are racked by violent conflicts.

I do not see how it is possible to make the case that Israel is so different, so exceptional, that it requires the severing of connections with even the more liberal, more critically-minded members of that society. Is it really possible to argue that there is in that country such a unique and excessive malevolence that it contaminates every aspect of civil society, including private foundations and universities. Let me remind you of something that Sari Nusseibeh once said: "If we are to look at Israeli society, it is within the academic community that we've had the most progressive pro-peace views and views that have come out in favor of seeing us as equals… If you want to punish any sector, this is the last one to approach."

I have always felt that exceptionalism has been a major problem for the rest of the world in relation to both the US as well as Israel. How then can I now take an exceptionalist position myself?

I also do not believe that a boycott of Israel would serve any useful tactical purpose at this time. For more on this, please see this.

Some have mentioned my action in relation to the Commonwealth Prize. I would like to point out however that I did not turn that prize down; I withdrew my book from the competition because I disagreed with the specific mandate of that prize and did not wish to see my work placed within that framework. Not for a moment would I have considered severing my connections, such as they are, with Britain and the British literary or academic worlds.

So I am afraid this is an issue on which we must agree to respectfully disagree.

Sincerely, Amitav Ghosh

.......................................................................................................................................................................................

Image: Amitav Ghosh

Photograph: Rajesh Karkera

Rediff News Desk