Rediff India Abroad
 Rediff India Abroad Home  |  All the sections

Search:



The Web

India Abroad




Newsletters
Sign up today!

Get news updates:
  
Mobile Downloads
Text 67333
Article Tools
Email this article
Top emailed links
Print this article
Contact the editors
Discuss this Article


Home > News > PTI

Centre has 4 weeks to file Rama Setu affidavits

January 31, 2008 19:21 IST

Related Articles
Denying Ram is denying India
'Nobody has proved that Ram did not exist'
'Adam's Bridge a man-made structure'
'Widening Ramar Sethu can amplify tsunamis'
'The Sethu Samudram does not make nautical sense'

The Supreme Court on Thursday granted another four weeks to the Centre to file affidavits related to the Sethusamudram project which is in the midst of a controversy over Rama Setu.

A bench headed by Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan accepted the request of Additional Solicitor General R Mohan that the two weeks time granted to the Centre on January 16 to file the affidavits be extended by four weeks and posted the matter for hearing in the first week of March.

Janata Party president Subramanium Swamy, who is one of the petitioners opposing the project, said it should be made clear that the Centre should not ask for any further adjournment and file two separate affidavits.

He reminded that the court had asked the Centre to review the alignments of the Sethusamudram project and, secondly, whether the Rama Setu, a mythical bridge situated south-east off Rameshwaram connected to the Talaimanar coast of Sri Lanka [Images], can be declared as a protected ancient monument.

Attorney General Milon K Banerji on January 16 had informed the court that a committee appointed by the Centre was re-examining the feasibility of the project.

During the last hearing, Swamy had said the Centre has not yet responded to the order passed by Madras high court asking it to conduct an archaeological investigation whether Rama Setu could be declared as protected ancient monument.

He said before his petition was transferred to the apex court, the high court had specifically directed the Centre to investigate whether Rama Setu qualifies to be categorised as a historical monument.

Instead, the Centre came out with two controversial affidavits questioning the existence of Lord Rama and manmade bridge Rama Setu which was withdrawn after large scale protest, Swamy had said.




© Copyright 2008 PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent.

Advertisement
Advertisement