Rediff India Abroad
 Rediff India Abroad Home  |  All the sections

Search:



The Web

India Abroad




Newsletters
Sign up today!

Get news updates:
  
Mobile Downloads
Text 67333
Article Tools
Email this article
Top emailed links
Print this article
Contact the editors
Discuss this Article


Home > News > PTI

Dangers of second hand smoke exaggerated, claims new study

November 21, 2007 11:17 IST

The perils associated with passive smoking have often been cited as reasons to seek a complete ban on smoking in public places, but a new study claims that the dangers of second hand smoke have been exaggerated.

In a new study, long time American anti-tobacco activist and physician Dr Michael Siegal has expressed grave concern over the 'obfuscation of facts' about second-hand smoke.

"The inaccuracies lie in overstating the effect of a single, transient exposure to second hand smoke-- a claim which cannot be validated by any scientific evidence," he says.

Siegal contends that only repeated exposure to second hand smoke is likely to increase the risk of a heart attack for a non-smoker.

"As far as the actual possibility of causing a heart attack is concerned, it is all the more unlikely. For that matter, even chronic exposure to second-hand smoke cannot cause a heart attack in a healthy non-smoker," he said.

Drawing parallels between eating a single fatty meal and being exposed to second hand smoke for 20-30 minutes, he said, "The 30 and 20 minute claims were based on studies that observed merely changes in the heart's functioning."

Siegal goes on to explain how all cardiac risks posed by exposure to second-hand smoke are in fact, reversible, that is a little while after the non-smoker is removed from the smoking environment, the heart resumes its prior state of functioning.

Siegal says that the argument that second-hand smoke "can raise a non-smoker's risk of suffering a fatal heart attack to that of a smoker" seems unfounded since only people with a history of severe coronary disease or asthma are likely to suffer any serious damage from such a transient exposure to second-hand smoke.

According to experts back home, however, whatever be the proven or non-proven basis of such arguments, smoking in public places should be avoided at any cost.

"No argument should deter me from not smoking in front of my family and co-workers," said Dr Ravi Kasliwal, senior cardiologist with the Indraprastha Apollo Hospital.

Growing evidence about the health risks of passive smoking has prompted many countries to ban smoking in public areas.




© Copyright 2007 PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent.

Advertisement
Advertisement