Rediff India Abroad
 Rediff India Abroad Home  |  All the sections

Search:



The Web

India Abroad




Newsletters
Sign up today!

Article Tools
Email this article
Top emailed links
Print this article
Contact the editors
Discuss this article


Home > News > Report

Kalam's decision wise: Expert

Sheela Bhatt in New Delhi | May 31, 2006 00:43 IST

Rajeev Dhawan, India's leading Constitutional expert told rediff.com, "This is a very, very far-reaching decision of President Abdul Kalam."

Dhawan said, "Under Indian Constitution the President has a right to send back – only once - a bill passed by the Parliament. The President is a part of the legislative process in India. President's judgment in this regard is "not on advise by Cabinet." This provision under the Constitution acts as a break, they balance out the government's actions. This right allows the President to exercise Constitutional principles over which Parliamentarians can rethink."

Office of Profit Issue: Complete Coverage

Dhawan says that the original idea behind the Constitutional provision to allow holding of an Office of Profit by Members of Parliament was that it would allow certain dignitaries to continue working for public good as well as letting them enrich the Parliament. People who are doing amazing social work can become members by getting exemption under "office of profit "provision.

The founding fathers of our Constitution thought that public good will be better served if certain people get seats in Parliament too, said Dhawan.

In the last session of Parliament a bill was passed giving too many exemption to many "offices" held by current MPs under the office of Profit provision and that too with retrospective effect is not signed by President Kalam.

Dhawan severely criticises exemptions given under the Office of Profit bill, which is now sent back to Parliament.

He said, "Provision of "Office of Profit" was never intended to legitimise which was something patently illegitimate. The current bill which President Kalam has refused to sign is clearly arbitrary in deciding the Office of Profit."

Dhawan said, "The President is right in refusing to sign such the bill which is arbitrary across the board. There is a Supreme Court judgment in a case belonging to Rajasthan government condoning a similar bill with retrospective effect. The President has disagreed with the majority view of Parliament. His refusal means that unconstitutional provision will bring down the standard of democracy. President Kalam wants Parliament to amend the bill."

Dhawan says Jaya Bachchan ,who is a former actress, was holding the post which was enabling Film development in Uttar Pradesh and that did not violate the original idea behind Office of Profit provision. Jaya was helping the Film development process, claims Dhawan.





Share your comments


 What do you think about the story?




Read what others have to say:


Number of User Comments: 11




Sub: The Post of the Speaker

Mr. Somnath Chatterjee sholud have resigned from the the high office of the Speakermuch earlier without waiting for a malafide piece of ligislation- the objective ...


Posted by Dr.AK. Chaudhuri





Sub: and a few in the bush

When it come to sharing of spoils our leaders would like to have a bird in hand and a few in the bush. This arrangement ...


Posted by JP Dubey





Sub: View

But they'll send it to him again and he will have to sign it.


Posted by Kaushik Das





Sub: Kalam Decision

Kalam shown oversmart, nobody need to teach Union Cabinet, which is under Manmohan.


Posted by G.Varghese





Sub: Rejection of Bill By Hon`ble President

Dear Editor, Since last 50 years, Indian Parliament and Indian Hon`ble Supreme Court, failed to established, supremecy in order. In Indian democratic system it is ...


Posted by Surendra Borkar




Disclaimer

Advertisement






Copyright © 2006 Rediff.com India Limited. All Rights Reserved.