Rediff India Abroad
 Rediff India Abroad Home  |  All the sections


The Web

India Abroad

Sign up today!

Article Tools
Email this article
Top emailed links
Print this article
Contact the editors
Discuss this article

Home > News > PTI

'N-deal could encourage proliferation'

February 26, 2006 15:48 IST
Last Updated: February 27, 2006 13:37 IST

Describing the talks on nuclear deal as a 'complicated issue,'India-United States Science and Technology Forum Co-Chair Norman P Neureiter has said that there were concerns amongcertain sections thattheaccord can encourage countries like Iran and have a 'negative impact' on non-proliferation efforts.

The eminent American scientist, however, emphasised that there were no concerns with regard to India misusing the agreement to become the proliferator of nuclear weapons.

"The real issue is - does it (the nuclear deal with India) have a negative impact on global efforts to stamp down proliferation. Some people in the US feel it does, others feel it will be strengthened if India comes in the fold," Neureiter told PTI in New Delhi.

"It is a complicated issue. Let us see what happens," said Neureiter, who is also Director of Centre for Science, Technology and Security Policy.

He said there were questions as to whether the US could have "closer relations with India without compromising the global efforts to stop proliferation."

President Bush comes calling

Noting that he was not taking any view, the eminent American scientist said there are different views as to whether "it will do irreparable damage to the NPT or will in the long term strengthen NPT."

Asked whether there were apprehensions in the US that India could misuse the deal, Neureiter replied in the negative and said "I think the issue is whether an exception to India gives encouragement to Iran and to other countries."

He said "certainly, if there is exception to India, Pakistan will say they should have the same thing."

His views assume significance as Pakistan has already started demanding a nuclear deal with the US and other countries on the lines of Indo-American agreement. Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf has himself made this demand.

Queried whether opposition from some sections in America to the deal stemmed from concerns that India could be a proliferator, Neureiter said, "I have not sensed anything like that."

He underlined that India had no record of proliferation and "I don't think it will be in the future. So that is not the concern. The concern is the example whether it does damage the NPT regime."

Asked whether he felt it was necessary for India to put Fast Breeder Reactors in the civilian side as insisted by the Bush administration, he said, "There are some people who feel that way but the Indian side does not want to put it in. We have to see how discussions come out."

On whether he believed the US Congress would endorse the deal without India putting the FBRs in the civilian side, Neureiter said he could not predict as "...there are different views. It remains to be seen how negotiations between the governments work out."

© Copyright 2006 PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent.
Share your comments

 What do you think about the story?

Read what others have to say:

Number of User Comments: 3

Sub: nuclear issu

it is not in the intrest of india

Posted by vikesh

Sub: Inappropriate title - glass half empty

The scientist is specifically saying that he has not opinion either way, but this report editorializes in the title by spinning it the negative way.

Posted by Suresh N

Sub: India should hold its ground!

I think it is in India\'s interest to select what goes into the civilian list and should\'nt encourage US to decide that.

Posted by srikanth



Copyright 2006 India Limited. All Rights Reserved.