Rediff India Abroad
 Rediff India Abroad Home  |  All the sections

Search:



The Web

India Abroad




Newsletters
Sign up today!

Article Tools
Email this article
Top emailed links
Print this article
Contact the editors
Discuss this article

Home > News > Specials

The Rediff Special/ Syed Firdaus Ashraf in Mumbai

1993 Mumbai blasts verdict puts spotlight on Sanjay Dutt

August 08, 2006

When special TADA judge P D Kode starts delivering the judgment in the 1993 Mumbai serial blasts case on August 10, his words will decide the fate of 123 accused persons charged with the conspiracy.

Out of them, however, all eyes will be on the fate of accused number 117.

That is Bollywood star Sanjay Dutt.

Nayak or khalnayak?

The question has been doing the rounds in the public mind ever since Dutt was arrested on April 19, 1993, for his alleged involvement in the 13 blasts that killed 257 people on March 12 that year.

Sanjay Dutt's lawyer, Farhana Shah, says, "We have placed our arguments before the court. Inshallah (god willing), he will come out clean."

If convicted, Dutt can get anything from five years' to life imprisonment under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act.

Dutt was released on bail for the first time on May 5, 1993, by the Bombay high court but the very next year his bail was cancelled and he was re-arrested in July 1994.

This time he spent 15 months at a stretch in jail and was released on October 18, 1995, after the Supreme Court intervened to grant him bail.

His incarceration was spent between Thane jail and Arthur Road jail; in between he was also admitted to JJ hospital after he took ill.

According to the Mumbai police, Dutt's links with the underworld began during the shooting of Yalgaar in Dubai in 1991, where he met underworld don Dawood Ibrahim and his brother Anis.

Since then he kept in regular touch with the underworld, states the police.

The Central Bureau of Investigation, which took over the probe from the Mumbai police, has charged Dutt with possessing an AK-56 during the 1993 Mumbai riots. The weapon was delivered to him by underworld don Abu Salem, film producer Samir Hingora and another accused Baba Moosa Chavan.

(Samir Hingora and his partner Hanif Kadawala were then co-producing Sanam starring Sanjay Dutt.)

Dutt had earlier admitted to the Mumbai police that he possessed an AK-56 but later on retracted this in the TADA court.

The prosecution has involved Dutt in the bomb blasts case stating that he knew about the conspiracy and was part of the gang that carried it out but kept quiet.

According to the prosecution, Dutt confessed to them that he was scared rightwing Hindu rioters would kill him and his family because his late father Sunil Dutt supported Muslim families affected in the Mumbai riots of 1992-93 in which more than 1,000 people were killed.

In his confessional statement, Dutt admitted to possessing the AK-56 and later on telling his close aide Yusuf Nulwala to dispose of it since he was shooting in Mauritius when the news became public.

Nulwala then approached Kersi Adajania to melt the AK-56. This was done, but parts of the weapon like rod and springs could not be melted.

The prosecution has produced the rod and the spring in the court as evidence against Dutt.

However, Farhana Shah says, "The rod and springs, only Allah or Bhagwan knows from where they got it. At this moment I can only say that there are discrepancies in the prosecution's statement. All the co-accused and witnesses against Sanjay have denied in court about their or Sanjay's involvement in this case."

Asked how Dutt has changed as a person in the last 11 years that she has handled the case, Shah said, "As far as his personal life is concerned I don't know much about him. His conduct in court is very good and he has always attended the court whenever he has been told to do so.

"He was targeted for no reason," Shah added. "Shiv Sena leader Madhukar Sarpotdar too was arrested with weapons during the Mumbai riots but nothing happened to him. And here, Sanjay Dutt was implicated for no fault of his."


The Rediff Specials


Share your comments


 What do you think about the story?




Read what others have to say:


Number of User Comments: 19




Sub: sanju baba

no, he should not be punished,whem it comes to give the punishment to the accused then what about our politician, they are the biggest terrorist ...


Posted by arun kaushik





Sub: Mumbai Blasts

The GUILTY should be punished.What is life on earth should be taught to them so that no one dares to do such things in future.


Posted by Bheemarao Deshpande





Sub: Sanjay Dutt Is not the only on who should be punished!!

If Sanjay should not be punished because even most of the punishers are worse than him.


Posted by Isumbushi





Sub: DUTT ?? IF he is found guilty, then he should be punished.

Not only DUTT, well i don't know about DUTT. but if indian police work hard and show some patriotism.....(atleast 1%), then lot of big names ...


Posted by Praneeth C Bhattaram





Sub: Bigger punishment for more famous.

These 'big' shots -- Especially Bwood heroes-- become role models for yongsters. IF they are punished heavily for their traitorship, that would be a big ...


Posted by ganesh




Disclaimer

Advertisement






Copyright © 2006 Rediff.com India Limited. All Rights Reserved.