Rediff India Abroad
 Rediff India Abroad Home  |  All the sections

Search:



The Web

India Abroad




Newsletters
Sign up today!

Article Tools
Email this article
Top emailed links
Print this article
Contact the editors
Discuss this article
Home > News > Interview

The Rediff Interview/John Kerry

October 14, 2004

After scoring a scoop with his interview with US President George W Bush -- the only interview the president has granted any South Asian publication -- last month, Aziz Haniffa, National Affairs Editor at India Abroad, the leading newspaper for the Indian-American community owned by rediff.com, scored a unique double last week by interviewingDemocratic Presidential candidate Senator John F Kerry.

In an exclusive interview, publishedin this week's issue ofIndia Abroad, Kerry discussed theIndian-American community's contributions to mainstream America, relations with India and, of course, outsourcing.

Part I: 'I will recognise the vital global role India will play in the 21st century'

Part II: 'Cross-border terrorism must stop. Period.'

The final partof thethree-part interview:

Virtually all of your foreign policy advisers have indicated that nuclear and ballistic non-proliferation will be a top priority on your foreign policy agenda and you will resurrect the Clinton administration's top foreign policy priority of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. Does this mean you will encourage India to sign the CTBT?

The CTBT promotes a vital interest shared by America, India, and the rest of the world: stopping nuclear proliferation and preventing nuclear terrorism. The objectives are advanced when as many nations as possible fully embrace international non-proliferation norms and standards. I will work towards that.

Ensuring our safety is about more than just the CTBT. India and the US have a very similar view of the need to implement a comprehensive international approach to preventing the transfer of nuclear materials and know-how to irresponsible governments and terrorists. I will work to strengthen cooperation with India in all vital aspects of non-proliferation. This is where my priorities will lie.

Your unambiguous and unequivocal stand against outsourcing has concerned India and by extension the Indian-American community, which feels it's a case of targeting India as the whipping boy for political expediency even though facts belie the rhetoric. How can you allay these apprehensions?

Your rhetoric have been seized upon by the Republican National Committee and even President Bush says you are anti-free trade and opposed to globalization and nothing but a protectionist at heart.

This is an issue about which some in the community are concerned. There have been misrepresentations of my position on the issue. What I am against is unfair tax laws that practically compel US companies to move operations overseas. I'm against a distorted tax code that rewards business leaders for shutting down American factories and laying off American workers, including those in the Indian-American community. They have been hit particularly hard by job losses in the information technology and medical diagnosis sectors.

Look at my record over two decades in the Senate. I have consistently supported free, fair and expanded trade. The outsourcing I oppose results from distortions and inequities in the tax code and other failures of a level playing field. I believe in a trade policy that builds jobs and improves the lives of working men and women.

I advocate a trade policy that is good for America and good for the world.

As an advocate of free and fair trade, I will make sure criticism of business practices which harm American workers doesn't generate a backlash against Indian Americans, the same way trade disputes with Japan in the 1980s led to incidents of anti-Asian bigotry.

I have absolutely no use for anyone who uses the outsourcing debate as an excuse to fan flames of intolerance.

Post-9/11, several innocent South Asian Americans and Indian Americans have been racially profiled and subjected to hate crimes. You have come out strongly against Attorney General John Ashcroft and the Patriot Act, arguing it is unconstitutional and un-American. Will you remove some of the draconian measures if elected? How will you remove concerns by Muslims, Arabs and South Asians that they are being unfairly targeted?

One of the great tragedies arising out of 9/11 is the way in which intolerance and discrimination have increased in this great land of ours. The effects of the post-9/11 climate of fear have been particularly severe on the South Asian community. Indian Americans have been targets of vicious slurs, heightened suspicions and even heinous hate crimes.

The victims have included Sikhs and Hindus as well as Muslims. The administration does not appear to think hate crimes represent a serious threat to American values. They are wrong. Such despicable acts have no place in our country.

In the Senate I have been at the forefront of the fight to strengthen hate crimes legislation. I have backed the Workplace Religious Freedom Act, which offers protection to workers from on-the-job discrimination related to religious beliefs and practices. I have supported legislation to end racial profiling. I have worked to provide real remedies for victims of the discriminatory practice.

I believe in an America that is safe and free. As President, I will defend our liberty and our security at home and appoint an attorney general who values and protects civil liberties. Like the eight justices of the US Supreme Court, I have rejected the Bush administration's policy of detaining American citizens indefinitely, without access to a lawyer or chance to prove innocence.

Some provisions of the Patriot Act --like the money laundering provisions --must be made stronger. Others -- like the library and 'sneak-and-peek' search provisions --must be made smarter, to better protect privacy and freedom while allowing our government to do everything necessary to track down terrorists and defend America.

As President, I will ensure the government is open and responsive to the needs and inquiries of Congress and the public, offering enough information to hold the government accountable without compromising security.

Have you read Aziz Haniffa'sinterview with President Bush?

Photograph: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Image: Rajesh Karkera


The Rediff Interviews

Share your comments


 What do you think about the story?




Read what others have to say:


Number of User Comments: 4




Sub: Old wine in new bottle

Everyone talks good before election.Remember the stand taken by the democrates to sign CTBT.Its because of Bush govt that issue had taken a back seat.


Posted by Jayant





Sub: kerry's interview

hi, i read the interview it was nice and i would like to say that NPT should be signed by all countries and mr kerry ...


Posted by amrinder





Sub: kerry's interview

hi, i read the interview it was nice and i would like to say that NPT should be signed by all countries and mr kerry ...


Posted by amrinder





Sub: Tall claims

Mr Kerry seem to be going high horses over Indians. Indian democracy although seem to be flourishing springs from a chaotic election conducted with no ...


Posted by janardhan




Disclaimer

Advertisement






Copyright 2005 Rediff.com India Limited. All Rights Reserved.