Rediff India Abroad
 Rediff India Abroad Home  |  All the sections

Search:



The Web

India Abroad




Newsletters
Sign up today!

Article Tools
Email this article
Top emailed links
Print this article
Contact the editors
Discuss this article
Home > News > Columnists > Francois Gautier

The Importance of being J M Lyngdoh

February 02, 2004

I am a Westerner andborn a Christian. I shouldbe happy that someone likeChief Election CommissionerJames Lyngdoh, a Christian, attracts so much attention from the Western press and gets so many accolades from foreign governments. When he recently won the Ramon Magsaysay Award, Asia's equivalent of the Nobel Prize, he didhis country proud. After all, had he not defied government pressure for an early election in riot-torn Gujarat and overseen fair polls in Kashmir? When again, he is trying all he can, before he retires in early February, to delay the advancement of elections by the BJP, he may be performing his duties as best as he conceives it.

Yet, it makes me slightly uneasy. Why? Two reasons. First he constantly belittles hiscountry, nay, he vomits India. When Mr Lyngodh appearson the BBC to say that not a single Indian politician is uncorrupt, not only does he say an untruth, but he does a lot of harm to India's image abroad, and reinforces colonial prejudices and biases against a wonderful tolerant country and a talented people.

It is truethere is a lot of corruption here and that politicians are sometimes dishonest. But if you take this present government, for instance, whatever its faults, you find a lot of its membersdo not take a single paisa for themselves, be itVajpayee,Advani,Joshi orFernandes (please go to his house in Krishna Menon Marg and see for yourself his lifestyle). It is very wrong to propagate the notion that Indians by nature are more corrupt than say Westerners, because it is absolutely false.

It is the system that breeds corruption here, the Nehruvian system to be precise, which may have stemmed from good intentions, but which in the end produced statism, bureaucracy and corruption. This system was meant for the poor, but now you need one crore rupees to be electedan MP, whereas officially, you are only allowed Rs 2lakhs. And where will the politician, however good, willing and sincere s/heis, find one crore rupees, except in the pockets of industrialists who will later demand favors? The system has to be reformed. The people are basically as good and prone to honesty or dishonesty asother people in the world, whatever the color of their skin andreligious beliefs.

Secondly, I know the likes of James Lyngdoh appeal, unconsciously, of course, to a certain Western sentiment of superiority and reinforce Westerners in their belief of the superiority of Christian monotheism versus Hindu polytheism. Christians still believethat Christ is the only true son of God and that all other beliefs --particularly those of the Hindus, who adore a multitude of 'heathen' Gods, are false. This is why Christian missionaries are even now at it in India, converting thousands of innocent tribals and Harijans, with the millions of dollars that gullible Westerners donate, so as to 'alleviate poverty in the Third World.'

This unconscious sentiment of superiority ofChristian culture overIndian culture also explains why the West likes to decorate Indians, who however brilliant and intrinsically good they are, propagate this image of a poor, corrupt, immature India, whether it is Amartya Sen, Mother Teresa, Arundhati Roy, or James Lyngdoh, three of them being Christians and the third one a Marxist who has adopted the Western way of thinking and life. Basically, they all have the same message: 'Oh, look at this poor, corrupt, pagan India, who is not capable of looking after herself and is too immature to have nuclear weapons.'This is whyWestern correspondents give so much coverage to Mr Lyngdoh and so little to more humble Indians who go quietly abouttheir work, without trying to hog publicity for themselves.

But ultimately, Indians are to blame themselves. The Indian intelligentsia, particularly,which is very brilliant, but also highly Westernized, because the best education in India is Christian and imprints itself in many subtle and not so subtle ways on its students. If Indian newspapers and televisionchannels would -- while not being blind to India's faults -- be a little more positive and a little less cynical and negative about theircountry, people like Mr Lyngdoh or Mrs Roy would find it very difficult to function.

Indeed, if Indian journalists, instead of propping up Mr Lyngdoh as a paradigm of virtue, would instead point out that it is wrong and unforgivable to use his high office for propagating his biased views, things would start improving quicklyin this great, generous and diverse country that is India.

Francois Gautier


Share your comments


 What do you think about the story?




Read what others have to say:


Number of User Comments: 42




Sub: importance of being j.m. lyngdoh

i fully agree with mr.gautier's views. we indians currently suffer from serious inferiority complex. the pseudo-intelligentsia of this country blindly accept the words and verdict ...


Posted by ganesan s.





Sub: francis is right to a greater extent.

no doubt that mr lyngdoh and the likes do serve the country in their respective fields to the best of their potential and talent but ...


Posted by sanjeev singh





Sub: Crap!

What has being Christian or Hindu or Muslim got anything to do with the topic? I, unlike the author, am an Indian. And I'd be ...


Posted by DZhivago





Sub: Of panachea and false notion !

'Indeed, if Indian journalists, instead of propping up Mr Lyngdoh as a paradigm of virtue, would instead point out that it is WRONG AND UNFORGIVEABLE ...


Posted by Gauzbig





Sub: Gautiers blind spot !

It was sad to read Gautiers 'article',he's been working hard propogating these myths for a while as he repeats them ad nauseam.Some home truths a)Indians ...


Posted by gauzbig




Disclaimer

Advertisement






Copyright 2005 Rediff.com India Limited. All Rights Reserved.