Rediff India Abroad
 Rediff India Abroad Home  |  All the sections


The Web

India Abroad

Sign up today!

Article Tools
Email this article
Top emailed links
Print this article
Contact the editors
Discuss this article
Home > News > Columnists > Ashwin Mahesh

Rescheduling Judgement Day

November 25, 2003

For much of the last four years, you could have followed the news in any of the nation's major publications and arrived at a more or less uniform conclusion about Mr Chandrababu Naidu. The eulogies to the chief minister's high-tech governance have been similar enough that with only minor editing the publications could have easily swapped each other's coverage of the leader from Andhra Pradesh. An assortment of Indian business leaders and multinational institutions have rounded out the praise-parade nicely, and the few missteps that were noted didn't get very much attention. These were merely understandable glitches in a get-it-done government.

Or so we were led to believe. Perhaps you read all those reports and came to the conclusion that the chief minister was incredibly popular, and would be re-elected with no trouble at all. That, it turns out, would have been a mistake.

Shortly after he survived a bomb attack from some of his subjects, Mr Naidu decided that the time was ripe to cash in on the inevitable sympathy that would follow. And so, he's decided it must be election time again in Andhra Pradesh. I've never heard of a politician who couldn't wait for his term to end, and Mr Naidu isn't about to set an unexpected precedent. The only reason to bring the polls forward is that he expects a more favorable verdict from the voters than might be the case if he waited the full term. He wouldn't be the first to try this sleight of political hand, and we cannot find him particularly more egregious than those who have trod this path before.

The one glitch in this scheme is the Election Commission's unwillingness to go along with his play, but with some cleverly restated truths that could possibly be managed. Here's T V R Shenoy who cannot understand the EC's desire to 'delay' the election, and says 'the EC is never prepared.' Why anyone, let alone the commissioner of elections, would 'prepare' for an early end to the term of a government that isn't facing any political trouble, he does not bother to ask. Whether it is reasonable for the EC to update electoral rolls in time for Mr.Naidu's term to expire, he does not. But he's certain that James Lyngdoh is 'delaying' the election, and that a constitutional crisis will be upon us should he prevail.

I mean, what's the rush? If Mr. Naidu's as much of a certain thing as he's made out to be, surely he can afford to have an election according to the expected schedule, rather than advance it to milk the people's emotions, can't he?

Or, could it be that the multiple reports of glowing government aren't very close to the truth? Could it be that people not more than a hundred kilometers from his office are fleeing in droves to urban centers in other states looking for a job -- any job -- that will keep them alive? Could it be that the grand vision of development that surrounds his policies is too narrowly tailored, and a great majority of the Telugu people have very little invested in it? Could it be that the largesse from New Delhi that supports his spending might falter if the durbar at Delhi should fall into other hands? Is the demand for an earlier election a pre-emptive strike on the Centre's treasury?

The practice of calling early elections to take advantage of favorable conditions is an insult to the voters. If Mr Naidu believes that at the time of the last election he obtained the confidence of the electorate to govern a full term, he should certainly do that. That is the privilege he would have claimed at the beginning of the term, and he'll certainly want a full five years should he be re-elected again. If, on the other hand, he believes that he no longer holds the confidence the people expressed four years ago, he should step aside. To demand an election to confirm the people's favor at an opportune time is the clearest indication of their likely disfavor at the scheduled time!

Judging by the past, it seems certain Mr Lyngdoh will prevail. Whenever partisan efforts to thwart his proper role as commissioner have made it to the courts, the EC has emerged on top. Very likely, then, that Mr Naidu's effort to set a favorable stage this time has little chance of survival. A face-saving compromise cannot be ruled out, however, and we will probably see the elections held slightly earlier than they otherwise might have been. But that's the most the CM can hope for. Beyond that, he'll have to take his chances with the voters, who'll rate him on his actual performance, not just their temporarily favorable disposition toward a man dodging bombs.

Ashwin Mahesh

Share your comments

 What do you think about the story?

Read what others have to say:

Number of User Comments: 12

Sub: Judgement Day

Good job Mahesh! You are one of the very few 'Indians' left in the country who is not biased either towards BJP or Congress or ...

Posted by gsnam

Sub: Two sides of the coin

It has become quite common for media to criticise Naidu for no reason. 10 years ago, AP was not known to many people. Today, the ...

Posted by King K

Sub: elections

hai It is absolutely true that it is not a good thing to cash on the peoples sympathy and turn them into votes I am ...

Posted by rajeshvarma

Sub: EC is no Judge

While Chief Minister Naidu may have tried to bank on sympathy wave /whatever to get re-elected, EC can't be judgemental about what the CM does. ...

Posted by Rajkumar Alagesan

Sub: You hit the nail on the head.

The Andhra CM, who has been portrayed cloyingly by all and sundry for mystifying reasons, has taken a hasty step which is governed more by ...

Posted by Sree Raghu Kanda



Copyright 2005 India Limited. All Rights Reserved.