Rediff India Abroad
 Rediff India Abroad Home  |  All the sections


The Web

India Abroad

Sign up today!

Article Tools
Email this article
Top emailed links
Print this article
Contact the editors
Discuss this article

Home > News > Report

Charges framed against Salman in hit-and-run case

May 02, 2003 15:24 IST

Holding film actor Salman Khan prima facie guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder in a hit-and-run case, a sessions courttoday rejected his plea to drop the charge and framed 10 charges in all against him. The actor pleaded not guilty to all of them.

Khan's vehicle,a Toyota Land Cruiser,had rammed a bakery insuburban Bandra, northwest Mumbai,on September 28, 2002,killing one person and injuring four others who were sleeping outside.

The trial will begin on July 2.

The judge held that Khan was prima facie guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder (section 304 of the Indian Penal Code) as he knew that rash and negligent driving had the potential of killing people.

Khan opposed the charge, which attracts a maximum penalty of10 years in jail, arguing that it was a case of rash and negligent driving, for which the maximum punishment prescribed under the IPCis two years.

Khan did not dispute any of the other charges. He said it was merely an accident case and he had no intention of killing anyone.

The charge of culpable homicide not amounting to murder can only be tried by a court of sessions. If that charge had been dropped, the case against the actor could have been tried by a magistrate.

Prosecutor R V Kini argued that the charge of culpable homicide is justified because Khan knew he was driving rashly and in a negligent manner.He pointed out that the actor's police bodyguard Ravindra Patil had warned Khan against driving rashly. Besides, the actor lives in the vicinity of the place where the accident occurred and was familar with the topography of the area and also the fact that people sleep by the pavement there.

Khan has also been charged under section 279 of the IPC (causing death by negligence of Noorulla Mahboob Sharif), section 338 IPC (causing grievous hurt to 17-year-old Abdul Rauf Shaikh), section 337 IPC (causing hurt to Kalim Mohammed Pathan and Munna Malai Khan), section 427 IPC (damaging property), section 134(A)(B) read with section 187 of the Motor Vehicles Act, section 3 read with section 181 of the same act (driving without licence), section 185 (driving under the influence of liquor), section 65 and section 66(i)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act.

The actor was present in court when the charges were framed.


© Copyright 2006 PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent.
More reports from Maharashtra
Read about: Telgi case | Mumbai blasts

Share your comments

 What do you think about the story?

Read what others have to say:

Number of User Comments: 14

Sub: Salman Case

Court proceedings must be expedited and punishment meted out quickly; no one is above law, and must face it; to prevent escape, provision fro confiscation ...

Posted by pnsmani

Sub: give the guy a break !

I am not a big fan of salman .. but give the guy a break ! The whole cackle of press and police is after ...

Posted by Miss busy

Sub: he must not get away with it.

After an act of such ruthlessness and coward ness no one should be allowed to move freely. Law is the same for all its should ...

Posted by chirag

Sub: Men above Law

People like Salman will be left without punishment. Our law can shoot poor and common Man and not for these Big people Like Salman , ...

Posted by Bharat Sahay

Sub: Road Accidents

Irrespective of the outcome of the Salman Khan case, we should not forget the age old maxim of 'Prevention is Better than Cure'. While people ...

Posted by DD



Copyright 2006 India Limited. All Rights Reserved.