|HOME | NEWS | COLUMNISTS | DILIP D'SOUZA|
|November 3, 2002||
Gujarat elections in December. Apart from a half-baked Hindutva --- call it pseudo-Hinduism --- that Narendra Modi and Company will trumpet, what's the other issue you can be sure will feature in the rhetoric as we rumble up to the polls? Water from the Narmada river, and particularly the Sardar Sarovar dam! So politically charged is the Narmada issue that no political party in Gujarat can afford to ignore it, much less begin to question the project. They will all vie to make claims, one more remarkable than the next. And I mean remarkable.
Take one: relieving the water woes of Rajkot, Modi's own assembly constituency. This Saurashtra city gets 20 minutes of water every second day. That fact should give you an idea of how desperate its residents are for water. For a long time now, they have been told that Sardar Sarovar is the answer to their longing.
So it was that on October 18, 2000, the day the Supreme Court allowed construction to resume on the Sardar Sarovar dam, that the then chief minister, Keshubhai Patel, had some things to say about water for Rajkot. Applauding the resumption, he also promised that "construction of the Irrigation By-Pass Tunnel would be taken up immediately and completed in about 100 days to help supply drinking water [from the Narmada] through the Malia canal and pipeline to ... Rajkot." [The Hindu, October 19, 2000].
"Water shortage," said Patel, "will now become a thing of the past for the people of Gujarat."
Well, 100 days from October 18, 2000, takes us to about the end of January 2001. As far as I can tell, by that time Rajkot was not much closer to a solution to its water problems than it had been 100 days earlier. I base this on a report I found on gujaratplus.com on March 1, 2001. It said:
(Modi's miracle, now there will be no scuffles for water.)
Haash havey to roje roj paani, saachi padi chhe bhajapni vani.
The write-ups don't mention the fact that the waters are of the River Mahi and are merely channelised through the Sardar Sarovar Malia branch canal.
Mahi water being passed off as the Narmada's? But it's water, right? So what does it matter which river it's from. If it really reached, I'm not quibbling. And Modi made an appearance in Rajkot on May 19 to "inaugurate the Narmada water supply" to Rajkot. Some papers carried a photograph of him handing over a large pot of the "Narmada water" to a Rajkot woman.
Well, 580 days instead of 100 --- but again, if the water really had arrived, who's counting? Well, I suppose I still am. Because on September 21, 2002, I woke up, opened my copy of The Times of India, and found a small item in it with this headline: Narmada water to reach Rajkot today. It informed me:
Whatever the numbers, Narendra Modi is mighty pleased. He has found a way to portray even this "service" to his constituency in pseudo-Hindu terms. "We have brought Narmada waters during Shravan, but the Congress would have wanted it in Ramzan," he told his recent Gaurav Yatra audiences. (Frontline, October 12-25 2002).
I'm not sure which Shravan in all those 700 days he had in mind, but never mind. Who's counting?
I read all this and I wonder, where does all this flim-flammery come from? Answer: the Sardar Sarovar project is simply riddled with it. And since we are talking about delivering water where it is needed desperately, let's ask: have project authorities estimated how many people will get this water?
Oh yes, they have! Many times. I have a 1988 publication from the Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited, authored by its then chairman Sanat Mehta, who writes that a "20.1 million population in 2021 will be able to get drinking water" from Sardar Sarovar. I have a 1989 Nigam publication that says the dam will deliver water to "29.5 million persons (2021 Census)". I have the 1998 edition of that same Nigam publication that says water will be delivered to a "prospective population of over 40 million by the year 2021". Later in that same 1998 edition -- the SAME book - I learn that water will be delivered to a "projected population of 29.26 million in 2021".
Well, 40 million instead of 29.5 million instead of 20.1 million.... When project authorities concoct estimates like this, should endless news items about solving Rajkot's water problems surprise anyone?
I read all this and I sorrow for Rajkot. I've never visited it, though I hope one day to go and to learn for myself what water is or is not reaching that city. Until then, I'd love to hear from any Rajkotians out there: what is the situation there, really? Am I going to soon read, yet again, that Narmada water is about to reach you? What should I think when I do?
And when the elections come around, regardless of which party asks for your vote, I'm hoping you will keep a few numbers in mind: 40 million, 580, 29.26 million, 700, 100....
|Tell us what you think of this column|
HOME | NEWS | CRICKET | MONEY | SPORTS | MOVIES | CHAT | BROADBAND | TRAVEL
ASTROLOGY | NEWSLINKS | BOOK SHOP | MUSIC SHOP | GIFT SHOP | HOTEL BOOKINGS
AIR/RAIL | WEDDING | ROMANCE | WEATHER | WOMEN | E-CARDS | SEARCH
HOMEPAGES | FREE MESSENGER | FREE EMAIL | CONTESTS | FEEDBACK