|HOME | NEWS | COLUMNISTS | ARVIND LAVAKARE|
|July 30, 2002||
J&K: Pre-1953 and its implications
The autonomy that father-and-son Abdullah dream of is the return of J&K to its pre-1953 status with regard to its constitutional position -- vis-à-vis the rest of India. That is simple. But what is the sanctity of that cut-off date for them?
The commoner interested in politics is unlikely to know despite the dozens of media discourses on the autonomy theme -- which say what about those discourses? Never mind.
You'll readily understand the significance of the 'pre-1953' phrase when told that it was on August 9, 1953 that Sheikh Abdullah, J&K's prime minister, was dismissed from office and detained under the state's Prevention Detention Act by the erstwhile yuvraj (in his capacity as the Sadar-i-Riyasat aka governor of the state). Abdullah and 25 others, 10 of whom were hiding or in Pakistan, were charged with conspiracy to 'overawe by force and show of force the duly constituted government of Jammu and Kashmir with the object of overthrowing it and facilitating the annexation of the State's territory by Pakistan' (The Guardian, London, September 19, 1962, and The Times, London, September 20, 1962, as cited on page 86 of The Constitution of Jammu & Kashmir, Universal Law Publishing Pvt Ltd, New Delhi, third edition, 1998, by Dr A S Anand, former chief justice of India.)
The matter was called the Kashmir Conspiracy Case and resulted in Sheikh Abdullah being in jail till January 1958 when he was released, only to be rearrested in April that year. Final charges were brought against him and others in August 1962 and the first prosecution witness gave evidence in the special sessions court, Jammu, on September 19 that year. Then, suddenly, the case was closed. Was Jawaharlal Nehru, the long-time friend of Sheikh Sa'ab, the invisible potentate? Never mind.
By then, however, considerable advance had occurred in J&K's constitutional relationship with the rest of India. Not only had the state's separate constitution seen the light of day on November 17, 1956, with its intricate links to India, but also several Indian parliamentary laws had become enforceable in J&K and many provisions of the Indian Constitution had become valid for the state in toto or with modifications. Those links had been effected by the President of India's 'Constitution (Application to Jammu and Kashmir) Order' of May 14, 1954 and its subsequent amendments from time to time -- all issued under Article 370 of the Indian Constitution.
Those links are what the 'pre-1953' autonomy demand now seeks to break though all of them were forged after the required consultation or concurrence of the reigning J&K government as required by Article 370. In short, Sheikh Abdullah's son and grandson want J&K to be reverted to that time zone when Sheikh Sa'ab was the 'Lion of Kashmir,' the Wazir-e-Azam of the once princely state of India.
To know what precisely the pre-1953 political status of J&K was, it is necessary to highlight what the President's Constitution (Application to Jammu and Kashmir) Order of January 26, 1950 did before it was repealed by a similar Order of four years later referred above.
The 1950 Order set out the constitutional relationship that was to exist between J&K and the Union of India immediately after the inauguration of the Indian Constitution. Of the 22 Parts of the Indian document, the Order made only Parts V, XI, XII, XV, XVI, XVIII, XIX, XX, XXI, and XXII (ten in all) applicable to J&K, and that too with modifications in some provisions. Thus --
More conspicuous is that all of Parts I to IV, Parts VI to X, Part XIII, Part XIV and Part XVIII were not made applicable to the J&K of pre-53. The critical constituents of these omissions were:
Apart from all of the above, Arun Shourie has pointed out an alarming anti-national facet of the demand of the Abdullahs. In an interview published in The Times of India, Mumbai, on July 8, 2000, he pointed out 'Financial integration of the state (J&K) with the rest of India was brought about in 1954; once you go back to 1953, the jurisdiction of the Reserve Bank goes, they get the right to have their own currency.'
So do the Abdullahs want their faces and signatures to ornament the currency notes in J&K? Those who sympathise with their call for the pre-1953 status must answer that billion-dollar question.
There is even a bigger question that these Abdullah supporters must answer. Why did the J&K Autonomy Committee's report not provide justification for its demand of reversing the long list of Parliamentary laws it wanted reversed for the state?
In this context, it must be remembered that the Indira Gandhi-Sheikh Abdullah accord of November 13, 1974 provided that i. the state government's proposals for altering or repealing the already modified application of any provision of the Indian Constitution to J&K would be treated on merit ii. Parliamentary laws on the Concurrent List extended to J&K after 1953 would be sympathetically considered for amendment or repeal. But no proposal on either came from the Sheikh Abdullah government, writes Jagmohan (currently a Union Cabinet minister and formerly twice governor of J&K) in his edit-page article in The Times of India, Mumbai, of July 11, 2000. Why?
The Abdullahs really have a lot to answer if only the politicians and media confront their antecedents and arrogance boldly and squarely. Unfortunately, there is nothing in the pre-1953 model on that score which warrants such a hope.
Tailpiece: A reader of an earlier column on autonomy ridiculed the 'ignorance' of the statement therein that J&K was the only state to have its own flag. He is referred to page 121 of Dr Anand's above-referred book. In footnote 3 of that page, the former chief justice says, 'Throughout India there is only one flag and Kashmir is the only State which has its own flag in addition to the Union flag.' Clearly, impudence is not the monopoly of the Abdullahs.
|Tell us what you think of this column|
ASTROLOGY | NEWSLINKS | BOOK SHOP | MUSIC SHOP | GIFT SHOP | HOTEL BOOKINGS
AIR/RAIL | WEDDING | ROMANCE | WEATHER | WOMEN | E-CARDS | SEARCH
HOMEPAGES | FREE MESSENGER | FREE EMAIL | CONTESTS | FEEDBACK