| Rediff India Abroad Home | All the sections | |
The sexiest man alive is no match for Christ Arthur J Pais | March 15, 2004 14:02 IST
Based on a novella by Stephen King, Secret Window presents Depp as a writer deeply troubled by a nasty divorce. His troubles worsen when a psychotic stranger turns up, claiming his idea has been stolen by the famed writer and turned into a successful novel. Most of the reviews from major publications were negative. Even Michael Wilmington of Chicago Tribune who called the movie 'a clever, tense thriller' admitted that it 'loses steam toward the end'. Some reviewers grudgingly admitted that Depp saved the film. In New York Post, for instance, Megan Lehmann wrote that the film 'works well as a showcase for Depp's idiosyncrasies.' But many critics echoed William Arnold, who concluded in Seattle Post-Intelligencer: "Johnny Depp can't save a clumsy thriller with no thrills or surprises." At the third position on the chart was the light-hearted comedy cop drama Starsky & Hutch, which grossed a cheerful $16 million. It was followed by Hidalgo, the race-themed film which looks like it is destined for an also-ran hit status. Over two weekends, it has grossed a decent $35 million, while Starsky & Hutch grossed $51 million for the same period. Hidalgo could end its run in North America with about $60 million.The newcomer Agent Cody Banks 2: Destination London certainly did not win many new friends, and many fans who had embraced the first film in the saga and turned it into a medium-sized hit stayed away. The reviews were not very positive and the word of mouth must have been not too inspiring. The film grossed $8 million. The first Cody Banks had opened with $14 million last year. It will be surprising if there is a third Cody Banks. In the new film, Frankie Muniz returns as Agent Cody Banks chasing a rogue CIA agent who has stolen a top secret mind control device. Cody has to go undercover in London posing as a student to retrieve the device. He also has to keep other kids from discovering his true identity while infiltrating the villain's den. In Chicago Tribune, Allison Benedikt called the movie 'another misguided outbreak of sequel fever'. And in Cincinnati Enquirer, Margaret A McGurk thought it was 'equally fluffy', as the first film but 'not as much fun'. In The New York Times, Dave Kehr noted: 'The subversive humour that occasionally brightened the first film... is absent from this sophomore effort'. The box office this week:
Click here for More Box Office Reports
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||