rediff.com

NewsApp (Free)

Read news as it happens
Download NewsApp

Available on  

Rediff News  All News 
Rediff.com  » Business » A SAIL plant fuels hope of industrial revival in Bengal

A SAIL plant fuels hope of industrial revival in Bengal

May 15, 2015 14:15 IST

The modernisation of IISCO Steel Plant in Burnpur can be a big boost for the state's industry if ancillary units come up around the plant

Prime Minister Narendra Modi at IISCO plant at BurnpurThe event was the completion of the modernisation of SAIL's IISCO Steel Plant by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Accompanying him was West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee.

Braving the sweltering heat, a large crowd had gathered to hear them speak.

Banerjee said, in 1998, when her party had given outside support to the National Democratic Alliance government at the Centre, she had submitted a wish list for Bengal to Atal Behari Vajpayee, then prime minister, which contained the revival of IISCO.

Clearly, the clamour to claim credit for SAIL's Rs 16,000-crore modernisation of its plant in investment-starved Bengal could hardly be resisted by political parties.

The West Bengal Congress said, without the intervention of Manmohan Singh, the former prime minister, who laid the foundation stone for this project in 2006, it wouldn't have been possible.

The Left Front claimed that former chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee had waived dues of Rs 300 crore to the state exchequer.

The local Bharatiya Janata Party unit thanked Modi profusely for dedicating the modernised plant to the nation.

The matter was laid to rest by Modi when he addressed the gathering at Burnpur with a backhanded swipe, "Koi iisco kahe, koi usko kahe, lekin aaj ka avsar toh hum sabko garv dene wala hai."

Did anyone hear any party take the blame for delaying IISCO's modernisation?

IISCO, the country's second oldest steel plant, has its origins sometime in 1870 when James Erkshire founded Bengal Iron Works.

After changing hands quite a few times, in the last decade of the 19th century, the plant at Kulti was bought over by Rajendranath Mookerjee and Acquin Martin. It was Mookerjee's son, Biren Mookerjee, who gave the plant a fresh lease of life.

"IISCO was the first company to get a World Bank loan in India. The loan was used for modernisation. Between 1961 and 1964, a blast furnace with Japanese technology, the most advanced at that point in time, was added. Coke oven battery, steel plant, open hearth furnace, long section mills also came up.

It all happened under the leadership of Biren," an old timer at IISCO recalls. That was the only modernisation that ever happened at the plant which at that time had a capacity of 0.5 million tonnes against India's 1.5 million tonnes.

In 1972, IISCO was nationalised.

At least 13 attempts were made at modernising the plant but none of the schemes was implemented and it was referred to the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction in 1994.

V Krishnamurthy, one of the most imposing of all SAIL chairmen, wrote in his book, At the Helm: "While I managed to get all the clearances for the Durgapur and Rourkela modernisation plans and get the work started, it is my lasting regret that I could take the modernisation of IISCO plant at Burnpur only up to the penultimate stage."

Rajiv Gandhi, who was prime minister then, had even suggested that IISCO be closed down on viability grounds.

"After two visits, I thought it would not be in the national interest to close the plant, since it had enormous locational advantages on account of being in the vicinity of coal and iron mines and close to the industrial belt of Kolkata/Howrah," Krishanmurthy wrote.

Krishnamurthy, however, came close to finalising a modernisation plan with the help of a Japanese consortium.

But Gandhi lost the elections and the VP Singh government that came to power put the plan under scrutiny.

"A project that would have put SAIL on a different growth path and galvanised the Indian steel industry was stalled for petty political reasons," rued Krishnamurthy in his book.

Hope finally revived in 2005. Eight Members of Parliament and five representatives from the Save IISCO Committee (comprising five trade unions) met Manmohan Singh. That the Left Front was part of the central government helped matters.

The Union Cabinet cleared the decks for a merger of IISCO (which used to be a subsidiary) with SAIL in 2005. Modernisation started the next year.

IISCO's revival has cost more than the refurbishment of SAIL's other units. That, old-timers say, is because of the age of the units. But will the investment help it turn around?

It's a tough task. As on March 2014, IISCO registered losses of Rs 529 crore.

"IISCO's modernisation was conceived when steel prices were at their peak.

But the project got delayed due to want of funds.

Ultimately, the civil and structural work started in 2012 and the basic oxygen furnace converter and continuous casting plant in 2014," says IISCO CEO Ishwar Chandra Sahu while explaining the reason behind the high cost of modernisation.

Demand problem

Now that the modernisation has got completed, the demand for steel has turned stagnant.

The near-term prospects don't look too good for IISCO. It makes long products for the construction and infrastructure sectors which are in the doldrums.

Sahu admits net sales realisation for TMT (used in the construction sector) has dipped in the past one-and-a-half years from Rs 38,000 a tonne to Rs 33,000 a tonne. However, there is some demand for long products, as reflected in the 1.7 million tonne imports in 2014-15.

That apart, IISCO has a huge competitive advantage in its captive iron ore mines at Gua and Chiria and its collieries at Chasnalla and Jitpur.

Plus, in the long-term, the technologically advanced products that it will be producing could ring in the good times once construction activity picks up in the country, which the industry expects will happen in the second half of the year. It also plans to export to Southeast Asia.

For West Bengal, the modernisation of IISCO could open up industry if ancillary units came up around the plant.

"The ancillary units need to be upgraded," Sahu, who plans to meet refractory and other allied units, says. The multiplier effect in a steel plant is huge.

In 2008, Bengal missed a huge opportunity when Tata Motors' Nano project with its ancillary units moved from Singur to Sanand in Gujarat after the Trinamool Congress launched an indefinite agitation against the acquisition of farmland for the project.

In three to four years, the Sanand-Becharaji zone will have an installed car manufacturing capacity of 1.46 million and around three million two-wheelers. Could IISCO do to Bengal what the Nano had set out to do?

SPANNING CENTURIES

  • 1870 Bengal Iron Works founded in Kulti
  • 1875 Iron production begins
  • 1890 It is renamed Bengal Iron & Steel Company, or BISC
  • 1918 IISCO sets up iron making plant at Burnpur
  • 1922 Iron production starts at Burnpur
  • 1936 BISC with its works at Kulti merges with IISCO
  • 1939 Steel Corporation of Bengal (SCOB) starts producing steel at Burnpur
  • 1953 SCOB merges with IISCO
  • 1960 Lists on London Stock Exchange
  • 1963-64 Achieves 100 per cent capacity utilisation
  • 1972 Govt of India takes over the plant
  • 1978 IISCO becomes a wholly-owned subsidiary of SAIL
  • 1994 Referred to BIFR
  • 2003 BIFR finalises plan to revive IISCO
  • 16 Feb 2006 IISCO merges with SAIL and renamed IISCO Steel Plant
  • July 2006 SAIL receives in-principle approval for expansion of IISCO Steel Plant for 2.5 MTPA crude steel
Image: Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the IISCO plant at Burnpur, West Bengal. Photograph: Kind courtesy, PIB

 

Ishita Ayan Dutt in Kolkata
Source: