Rediff India Abroad
 Rediff India Abroad Home  |  All the sections

Search:



The Web

India Abroad




Newsletters
Sign up today!

Article Tools
Email this article
Top emailed links
Print this article
Contact the editors
Discuss this article

Home > Business > PTI > Report


Trainees are not employees: SC

February 01, 2006 14:53 IST

Holding that trainees are not employees, the Supreme Court has ruled that they are not entitled to provident fund.

A Division Bench of Justice Arijit Pasayat and Justice R V Raveendran, held that trainees were apprentices, engaged under the Standing Order of an organisation under the Apprentices Act, and therefore employers were not obliged to contribute to the Provident Fund for them.

The Bench upheld a Karnataka High Court order, quashing the petition of Regional Provident Fund commissioner, Mangalore, asking Central Arecanut and Coca Marketing and Processing Cooperative Limited (CACMPCL) to contribute provident fund for 25 trainees at its chocolate factory in Puttur.

Trainees, who are paid a stipend during the training period, have no right to employment, and it is for the employer to offer or not to offer a job to them, it said.

The court clarified that though the term 'employee' under the Provident Fund Act, included apprentices, these apprentices, engaged under the Apprentices Act, under standing order of an organisation were excluded from it.

The court said, "In the case at hand, trainees were paid stipend during the period of training. They had no right to employment, nor an obligation to accept any employment, if offered by the employer. Therefore the trainees were apprentices engaged under the standing order of the establishment."

The counsel of the Provident Fund commissioner had contended that Section 2(f) of the Employee Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1952, should be given a wider meaning for the benefit of the employer.



© Copyright 2005 PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent.

Share your comments


 What do you think about the story?




Read what others have to say:


Number of User Comments: 3




Sub: Traineeds: Employee bonds

If there is NO PF to Trainees and tell me how about BONDS, signed by employees during their training period.... Looking for ur replies ...


Posted by babu





Sub: Employer's time for exploitation

Though I do agree with the judgement, Indian employers may take this judgement to justify their exploitation of new joinees


Posted by Indian Lover





Sub: Opens door to trainee exploitation

This judgement has far reaching consequence. Employers often employ new joinees as trainees. As of now employers deliberately delay the confirmation of trainees on some ...


Posted by Gautam Sinha




Disclaimer


Advertisement






Copyright 2006 Rediff.com India Limited. All Rights Reserved.